MedPath

PRELUDE Study of Lymphatic Surgery to Treat Breast Cancer Related Lymphoedema

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Lymphedema
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery combined with near infrared spectroscopy imaging
Registration Number
NCT04579029
Lead Sponsor
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Brief Summary

Lymphoedema is a chronic debilitating disease that can have severe adverse effects on day-to-day life causing great physical and visual discomfort. The clinical presentation is characterised by chronic swelling of limbs, accompanied by localised pain, skin changes and recurrent infections. It is caused by a disruption in lymphatic flow which prevents the normal circulation of interstitial fluid (situated in the spaces between the cells of the body), resulting in swelling of the affected limb. It can be primary (cause unknown) or secondary to a number of causes such as malignancy, trauma, surgery, radiotherapy, infection, or venous disease.

In breast cancer treatment, axillary surgery and radiotherapy significantly damage normal lymphatic drainage of the upper limb, causing lymphoedema in 1-in-5 patients.

There is a growing body of evidence that this chronic and debilitating condition can be better managed through early surgical intervention rather than the current conservative management, which rely on pressure garments and massage. This surgical intervention, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), joins up a number of the draining lymphatic vessels to correspondingly sized veins on the affected limb using microsurgical techniques. A special dye and camera system is used to facilitate identifying lymph vessels. This creates a new drainage pathway for the lymph fluid around the area of disruption, improving lymphatic flow. Volume reduction is expected and this would be expected to provide quality of life benefits for the patients.

This study seeks to compare the outcomes from both therapies and determine whether LVA surgery can help to improve the physical burden and quality of life for patients affected by lymphoedema. Furthermore, lymphoedema places a substantial burden on NHS services. If this trial is successful, LVA surgery could improve patient outcomes and reduce the overall cost of treatment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
64
Inclusion Criteria
  • Breast cancer patients treated with axillary surgery who have developed post-surgical lymphoedema (increase in limb volume by >10% for 1 month or longer)
  • Patients must have completed their adjuvant therapy (excluding hormonal/long term Rx)
  • Patients must be within 6 months of having developed documented lymphoedema
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Contraindications to the use of the contrast agent (iodine allergy / untreated hypothyroidism)

    • Near infra-red spectroscopy providing insufficient data to guide surgery or evidence of LVA incompatibility (As these patients will be have only just developed lymphoedema, they are by definition very early in the spectrum of disease progression. Thus, the chances of all superficial lymphatics deteriorating to the extent that LVA surgery is not possible is extremely low - <1% we expect).
    • Inability to give informed consent or cooperate with assessment procedures and follow-up because of cognitive or physical impairments
    • Medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of general anaesthetic (significant cardiac / respiratory disease)
    • Recurrent, metastatic or progressive disease, defined by oncology team on basis of clinical assessment or imaging
    • Evidence of pre-existing / primary lymphoedema on clinical history or lymphoscintigraphy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Surgical CohortLymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery combined with near infrared spectroscopy imagingPatients randomised to the surgical group will undergo near infrared spectroscopy imaging to assess suitability and plan the surgical procedure. Limb measurements with perometry and bio-impedance spectroscopy will be performed at baseline. Under general anaesthetic multiple LVA bypass procedures will be performed on the affected arm. Near infrared spectroscopy imaging will be used throughout. One week after discharge the patient will return for the bandages to be removed and the wounds inspected for any evidence of infection before renewing the bandage. Again, two weeks after surgery, the patient will return for inspection of wound and removal of sutures. It is at this point that the surgical patients will be returned into a standard lymphoedema compression garment, fitted by the research nurse. Thereafter, standard follow up (Bilateral) measurements and checks will be done at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean excess volume reduction - compared between two cohorts12 months from recruitment

Primary outcome measure is to evaluate the efficacy of LVA surgery (combined with CGT) by comparison of arm volume measurements across both the surgical and the control group at set time points post-surgery). This will be performed using the mean excess volume reduction (EVR) as a percentage change at 12 months - measured with perometry.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cellulitis12 months from recruitment

Compare the incidence of cellulitis in both groups within the 12-month study period

Safety - infection and surgical complications12 months from recruitment

Assess the safety of LVA surgery (supported by PDE imaging guidance) by recording incidence of infection and post-operative complications.

Compliance12 months from recruitment

Compliance with use of compression therapy during the study.

Quality of life - LYMQOL score12 months from recruitment

Compare longer term Quality of Life (QOL) in both groups using a quality of life assessment tool for lymphoedema of the limbs (LYMQOL) completed by patients. Multiple questions covering function, appearance, symptoms and mood are asked, with a quality of life score for each between 1 and 4. Total score 16 (higher score = poorer quality of life)

Bio-impedance spectroscopy12 months from recruitment

Compare changes in bio-impedance spectroscopy during the period of the study

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mark Brandon-Grove

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath