CTRI/2023/09/057754已完成3 期
A Comparative Evaluation of Different Gingival Retraction Methods – A Double Blinded In Vivo Study - NI
Dr Unnati Agarwal0 个研究点目标入组 36 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 36
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •i.Patients willing for voluntary participation & have signed informed consent for the described procedure.
- •ii.Patients having good physical and mental health.
- •iii.Systemically healthy subjects.
- •iv.Patients requiring two individual single unit Fixed partial denture.
- •v.Patients well motivated for fixed partial denture.
- •vi.Patients well motivated for Porcelain fused Metal crown.
- •vii.Patients with healthy gingiva.
排除标准
- •Partially edentulous patients
- •ii.Patients with implant site
- •iii.Patients with gingival recession
- •iv.Periodontally compromised tooth
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
To compare three gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent.CTRI/2021/05/033770Hardik Maradiya
已完成
不适用
Root coverage procedure on restored root surfacesGingival recession.Gingival recessionIRCT138812141248N2Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences30
尚未招募
4 期
se of chitosan as periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgeryCTRI/2020/04/024645Dr Bhavani
已完成
不适用
Treatment of gingival recession using two different soft tissue graft procedures: a comparative studyCTRI/2020/05/024978Dr Neelima Katti22
尚未招募
3 期
Cosmetic Treatment of Gums.CTRI/2023/08/057041Dr Sireesha Anumula