CTRI/2023/09/057754
Completed
Phase 3
A Comparative Evaluation of Different Gingival Retraction Methods – A Double Blinded In Vivo Study - NI
Dr Unnati Agarwal0 sites36 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified
- Sponsor
- Dr Unnati Agarwal
- Enrollment
- 36
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •i.Patients willing for voluntary participation \& have signed informed consent for the described procedure.
- •ii.Patients having good physical and mental health.
- •iii.Systemically healthy subjects.
- •iv.Patients requiring two individual single unit Fixed partial denture.
- •v.Patients well motivated for fixed partial denture.
- •vi.Patients well motivated for Porcelain fused Metal crown.
- •vii.Patients with healthy gingiva.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Partially edentulous patients
- •ii.Patients with implant site
- •iii.Patients with gingival recession
- •iv.Periodontally compromised tooth
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To compare three gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent.CTRI/2021/05/033770Hardik Maradiya
Completed
Not Applicable
Root coverage procedure on restored root surfacesGingival recession.Gingival recessionIRCT138812141248N2Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences30
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
se of chitosan as periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgeryHealth Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitisHealth Condition 2: K053- Chronic periodontitisCTRI/2020/04/024645Dr Bhavani
Completed
Not Applicable
Treatment of gingival recession using two different soft tissue graft procedures: a comparative studyCTRI/2020/05/024978Dr Neelima Katti22
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Cosmetic Treatment of Gums.CTRI/2023/08/057041Dr Sireesha Anumula