IRCT138812141248N2已完成未知
Clinical comparison of the localized gingival recession coverage in root surfaces restored with GIOMER and intact root surfaces .
Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences0 个研究点目标入组 30 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 30
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 years 至 80 years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Miller Cl I or II gingival recession defects with at least 3 mm depth of defects , the vestibular depth shoul be at least 3 mm and the teeth mustbevital, Intention for attend to the study. Exclusion criteria: serious systemic disease.
排除标准
- 未提供
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
To compare three gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent.CTRI/2021/05/033770Hardik Maradiya
已完成
不适用
Treatment of gingival recession using two different soft tissue graft procedures: a comparative studyCTRI/2020/05/024978Dr Neelima Katti22
已完成
3 期
Comparison of 3 different gingival retraction agentsCTRI/2023/09/057754Dr Unnati Agarwal36
尚未招募
4 期
se of chitosan as periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgeryCTRI/2020/04/024645Dr Bhavani
已完成
不适用
Effect of two different gum displacement materials -A clinical studyCTRI/2022/10/046181Dr Aditya Acharya30