IRCT138812141248N2
Completed
未知
Clinical comparison of the localized gingival recession coverage in root surfaces restored with GIOMER and intact root surfaces .
Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences0 sites30 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Gingival recession.
- Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 30
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Miller Cl I or II gingival recession defects with at least 3 mm depth of defects , the vestibular depth shoul be at least 3 mm and the teeth mustbevital, Intention for attend to the study. Exclusion criteria: serious systemic disease.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To compare three gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent.CTRI/2021/05/033770Hardik Maradiya
Completed
Not Applicable
Treatment of gingival recession using two different soft tissue graft procedures: a comparative studyCTRI/2020/05/024978Dr Neelima Katti22
Completed
Phase 3
Comparison of 3 different gingival retraction agentsHealth Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecifiedCTRI/2023/09/057754Dr Unnati Agarwal36
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
se of chitosan as periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgeryHealth Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitisHealth Condition 2: K053- Chronic periodontitisCTRI/2020/04/024645Dr Bhavani
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of two different gum displacement materials -A clinical studyHealth Condition 1: K06- Other disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridgeCTRI/2022/10/046181Dr Aditya Acharya30