跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01252927
NCT01252927已完成不适用

Evaluation of a Gatekeeper Training Program as Suicide Intervention Training for Medical Students

University of Manitoba1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 112 人开始时间: 2011年3月27日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
112
试验地点
1
主要终点
OSCE global rating total score

研究概览

简要总结

The main objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy of a gatekeeper training suicide intervention program, Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST), in improving medical students' knowledge about suicide intervention, impact of attitudes on someone at risk for suicide and competent use of intervention skills to recognize risk and intervene effectively compared to medical education as usual. This research project will be undertaken using a randomized-controlled trial design. Questionnaires and objective structured clinical examinations using simulated patients will be completed at three time points: 1) before training, 2) after training, and 3) at one year following the training. Medical students' clinical skills in recognizing risk and intervening with simulated patients, as well as knowledge about suicide intervention and the impact of attitudes on someone at risk for suicide will be evaluated.

详细描述

The current proposal plans to implement and evaluate a secondary suicide intervention skills training program (gatekeeper training) in medical school students in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The main objective of the current proposal is to evaluate the effectiveness of a gatekeeper training program, Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST), in improving medical students' intervention skills with suicidal patients compared to training as usual. Secondary aims include comparisons of changes in knowledge, perceived competence and attitudes around suicide.

Findings from previous studies have demonstrated a significant positive effect of gatekeeper training on suicide prevention attitudes, skills and knowledge. As well, general studies in medical education reveal that students who have been able to practice, observe, and receive feedback in small groups showed an improvement in skills and confidence over those who were given didactic teaching only. Therefore, the investigators anticipate that the ASIST training program will significantly improve medical students' knowledge about suicide intervention, and will increase their recognition and response to suicide risk compared to education as usual. The investigators also expect that ASIST training will help them to understand the impact of attitudes on suicide prevention, and will increase their perceived competence and ability to recognize and treat a suicidal individual compare over training as usual. It is hypothesized that medical students trained in ASIST will differ significantly in their ability to correctly recognize and intervene with suicidal individuals based on their use of a standardized suicide intervention model and objective assessment using standardized patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •all medical students at University of Manitoba

排除标准

  • •those who choose not to participate
  • •those who have already taken ASIST training or related SafeTALK training

研究组 & 干预措施

ASIST intervention

Experimental

The gatekeeper training intervention group received the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) 10.0 in addition to TAU. ASIST is a two-day (fourteen hour), intensive, interactive and practice-dominated course aimed at enabling people to recognize risk and learn how to intervene immediately to prevent suicide. The intervention was offered to students on a weekend and was conducted by three senior ASIST trainers and one junior trainer, with two trainers assigned to each training group.

干预措施: ASIST (Other)

Control group: training as usual

No Intervention

Training as usual consisted of didactic teaching and a tutorial with case-based examples around suicide risk factors in their first year of medical school. Third- and fourth-year students may also have the opportunity to practice their skills with real patients during their clerkship rotations or in the emergency department.

结局指标

主要结局

OSCE global rating total score

时间窗: 1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training

Four Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) stations were developed for each time point in the study. All student-patient interactions were videotaped. Raters blind to the student's group assignment rated the videos. Raters were asked to give a global rating score according to the performance of each student in each of the 3 key areas trained by the ASIST program, and a global rating of the student's performance on the station in general. The sum of all global ratings was used to determine a total score.

OSCE checklist total score

时间窗: 1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training

Four Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) stations were developed for each time point in the study. All student-patient interactions were videotaped. Raters blind to the student's group assignment rated the videos according to a checklist of desired gatekeeper behaviors based on the key components of the ASIST program. A total score was the sum of all behaviours performed.

SIRI-2 score

时间窗: 1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training

The Suicide Intervention Response Inventory (SIRI-2) is a self-administered questionnaire designed to measure competence in choosing appropriate responses to a series of clinical scenarios with suicidal individuals. It contains 25 items, each of which consists of a "client" remark and two "helper" responses. Respondents were instructed to evaluate the appropriateness of each of the two helper responses on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from +3 (highly appropriate response) through 0 (neither appropriate nor inappropriate response) to -3 (highly inappropriate response). Ratings by a group of expert suicidologists and crisis interventionists provided a mean expert response criterion against which individual respondents are compared. The sum of the absolute value of the differences between the students' rating and the mean response from experts was calculated to obtain an overall score of how well the student performed with respect to expert responses.

次要结局

  • self-perceived knowledge about suicide(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)
  • self-perceived skill in helping a suicidal individual(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)
  • Attitudes towards suicide total score(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)
  • self-perceived preparedness(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)
  • self-perceived confidence in helping a suicidal individual(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)
  • Total score on Interpersonal Skills Rating Scale(1 week before training, 1 week following training, and 4 years following training)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shay-Lee Bolton

PhD

University of Manitoba

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验