Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement - A Propensity Matched Comparison of Upper-Hemisternotomy vs. Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy
- Conditions
- R99I63.9Other ill-defined and unspecified causes of mortalityCerebral infarction, unspecified
- Registration Number
- DRKS00033940
- Lead Sponsor
- niversitätsklinikum Würzburg
- Brief Summary
Our MI-AVR (minimally-invasive aortic valve replacement) experience in an all-comer scenario shows good short-term results. Both groups had comparable high survival rates at 1-year irrespective of age difference and physical status. Postoperative hospital stay and need for PPM were satisfactory low in both groups. In times of increasing catheter-based aortic valve implantation, expanding MI-AVR programs remain a sine qua non for all cardiac surgery clinics.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 640
Inclusion Criteria
all patients between 2007 and 2021 operated at the University Hospital Würzburg, Department for cardiac surgery, that underwent aortic valve replacement through a minimally-invasive approach
Exclusion Criteria
Emergency,
Critical preoperative state
Study & Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method