To Compare the Efficacy of Surgery Followed by Sunitinib With Surgery Followed by Imatinib in GIST Patients With Progression on Imatinib.
- Conditions
- GIST
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03424876
- Lead Sponsor
- Peking University
- Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib
- Detailed Description
Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint:To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy.
Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST.
- . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized.
- . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons.
- at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment.
- at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery.
- . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.
- . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib
- . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor.
- . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month.
- . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm A Imatinib 400mg Imatinib 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, and within 6 weeks after surgery, continuous treatment was not tolerated until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated. Arm B Sunitinib 37.5Mg Oral Capsule Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2), began within 6 weeks after surgery, and was continuously administered until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Security 12 months Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria.
Molecular marker detection 12 months Gene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance
Efficiency 12 months The curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Beijing Cancer Hospital
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China