MedPath

To Compare the Efficacy of Surgery Followed by Sunitinib With Surgery Followed by Imatinib in GIST Patients With Progression on Imatinib.

Registration Number
NCT03424876
Lead Sponsor
Peking University
Brief Summary

To compare the efficacy of surgery followed by sunitinib with surgery followed by imatinib in GIST patients with progression on imatinib;To investigate the optimal therapy after surgery in GIST patients with focal or multifocal progression in imatinib

Detailed Description

Primary Endpoint: To evaluate the progression free survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib Secondary Endpoint:To evaluate the overall survival of the patients with progression receiving surgery followed by sunitinib therapy comparing with surgery followed by imatinib the relationship of c-kit secondary mutation and progression free survival of surgery followed by TKI therapy the safety and tolerability of the two therapy.

Statistics:All the statistical analysis is performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM corporation, United States). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables. PFS and OS analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test and multivariable analyses were performed to assess survival difference. A two sided p-value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  1. .Histopathological diagnosis of metastatic GIST.
  2. . After the treatment of imatinib, imatinib 400mg/day after treatment, the tumor generalized.
  3. . Patients with generalized progress were satisfied with tumor reduction after imatinib resistance for various reasons.
  4. at least 1 month after surgery for imatinib treatment or sunitinib treatment.
  5. at least one imaging assessment was received after surgery.
  6. . Complete clinical data and follow-up data.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. . Before operation, he was treated with sunitinib
  2. . Patients receiving tumor reduction were not satisfied with the standard of the reduction of tumor.
  3. . The treatment of imatinib or sunitinib after surgery was less than 1 month.
  4. . Incomplete clinical data or follow-up data.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Arm AImatinib 400mgImatinib 400 mg/day or 600mg/day, and within 6 weeks after surgery, continuous treatment was not tolerated until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated.
Arm BSunitinib 37.5Mg Oral CapsuleSunitinib 37.5 mg/day, continuous taking, or 50 mg/day (4/2), began within 6 weeks after surgery, and was continuously administered until tumor progression, recurrence or adverse reactions were not tolerated
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Security12 months

Clinical and laboratory toxicity/symptoms will be graded according to the nci-ctc toxicity criteria.

Molecular marker detection12 months

Gene mutation of c-kit/PDGFRA of imatinib resistance

Efficiency12 months

The curative effect was evaluated by measuring the unprogression-survival (PFS) each treatment group.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Beijing Cancer Hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, Beijing, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath