跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04633434
NCT04633434已完成不适用

Utilizing Smart Speaker Technology to Deliver Parenting Education Support to Parents of Young Children

Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc.2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 98 人开始时间: 2021年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
98
试验地点
2
主要终点
Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Positive Encouragement Subscale

研究概览

简要总结

After development of the prototype Bedtime Routine module of the Talk Parenting program, the investigators will evaluate its feasibility and initial efficacy in a within-subjects pre-post design study. Through recruitment partner agencies, the investigators will recruit a sample of 49 at-risk families (49 primary parents, 49 target children). Primary parents will be assessed at enrollment via online an questionnaire, then provided an Amazon Echo Dot and asked to use the Bedtime Routine module for 4 weeks. They will then be re-assessed with the online questionnaire at 4 weeks (at treatment completion). Although children were considered enrolled participants that actively participate in the intervention, we obtained no assessment data from the children themselves.

详细描述

Parents provide consent for their own participation, as well as the participation of their target child (their child aged 3-5 years who presents the most behavioral challenges). After consent, primary parents complete the baseline (T1) questionnaire via the Qualtrics online assessment platform and then are provided an Echo Dot with the Bedtime Routine module enabled. After 4 weeks post-baseline, they are administered the T2 questionnaire. This design allows evaluation of T1-T2 change and satisfaction/usability of the Bedtime Routine prototype module. Although children were considered enrolled participants that actively participate in the intervention, we obtained no assessment data from the children themselves.

T1 and T2 questionnaires measure primary parents' parenting practices, self-efficacy, and stress; children's behavior, emotional adjustment, and sleep problems; and the parent-child relationship. The T2 questionnaire also contains measures of parent satisfaction, acceptability, and usability of the Talk Parenting skill, as well as any difficulties experienced, or problems made worse. Demographics are collected at T1. T1 and T2 questionnaires are administered via Qualtrics, an online assessment tool. Project staff follow-up with parents as needed to encourage questionnaire completion in a timely manner. Parents are paid $20 per assessment.

Families are provided an Echo Dot device with the Talk Parenting skill already enabled using a research Amazon account created for each family. The Echo Dot devices are paired with portable auxiliary battery packs to enable mobile use within the home, so that the device can be carried from room to room during execution of the bedtime routine. The devices are preconfigured by project staff onto research Amazon accounts. All families are provided a pre-configured wifi adaptor that creates a wifi network specific for the Echo Dot device to connect to. After the baseline assessment (T1), primary parents are mailed their Echo Dot device, portable auxiliary battery pack, wifi adaptor, and set-up instructions; staff provide follow-up phone support as needed. Usage data show whether families have used the device; project staff contact the parents to assist set up if parents have not enabled/used the device within 2 weeks. To ensure exposure to Talk Parenting, parents are asked to engage with the skill at least twice per week (or at least eight times); project staff prompt parents two to three times (via text, email, or phone, depending on parents' preference) during the 4-week period to encourage usage and provide technical support as needed.

At the end of the study, families are asked to return the wifi adaptor to the project offices; families are free to keep the Echo Dot device and auxiliary battery pack.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
3 Years 至 90 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Positive Encouragement Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Positive Encouragement and Coercive Parenting subscales of the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) are used to measure parents' positive encouragement and coercive parenting. The Positive Encouragement subscale is measured with three items, answered on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); summed scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Coercive Parenting subscale is measured with five items, answered on the same 4-point scale; summed scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Each subscale shows good internal consistency and construct validity.

Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) - Coercive Parenting Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Positive Encouragement and Coercive Parenting subscales of the Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) are used to measure parents' positive encouragement and coercive parenting. The Positive Encouragement subscale is measured with three items, answered on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); summed scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Coercive Parenting subscale is measured with five items, answered on the same 4-point scale; summed scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Each subscale shows good internal consistency and construct validity.

Child Adjustment and Parent Self-Efficacy Scale (CAPES) - Emotional Adjustment Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) measures children's behaviors and emotional adjustment. The Behavior Problems subscale consists of 16 problematic and 8 reverse-coded positive behaviors. Respondents answer on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); the summed scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Emotional Maladjustment subscale has 3 items. Respondents answer on the same 4-point scale; the summed scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The CAPES is also used to measure parents' self-efficacy; parents rate their confidence that they can successfully deal with each of the 19 negative behaviors/emotions on the CAPES. Respondents answer on a 10-point scale (1=Certain I can't do it; 10=Certain I can do it); the summed scores range from 19-190, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Child Adjustment and Parent Self-Efficacy Scale (CAPES) - Behavior Problems Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) measures children's behaviors and emotional adjustment. The Behavior Problems subscale consists of 16 problematic and 8 reverse-coded positive behaviors. Respondents answer on a 4-point scale (0=Not at all; 3=Very much); the summed scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Emotional Maladjustment subscale has 3 items. Respondents answer on the same 4-point scale; the summed scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The CAPES is also used to measure parents' self-efficacy; parents rate their confidence that they can successfully deal with each of the 19 negative behaviors/emotions on the CAPES. Respondents answer on a 10-point scale (1=Certain I can't do it; 10=Certain I can do it); the summed scores range from 19-190, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Short-Form Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (SF-CSHQ)

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Children's bedtime/sleep problems is measured with the Short-Form Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (SF-CSHQ), a 23-item version of the widely used Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). Respondents answer on a 5-point scale (1=never; 5=always); average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The SF-CSHQ shows good validity against the original CSHQ, external validity, internal reliability, and sensitivity to change.

Program-Targeted Parenting Practices - Frequency of Engagement Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Frequency of parents' engagement in the parenting practices targeted by the intervention, and parents' self-efficacy for doing so, are measured by the Program-Targeted Parenting Practices measure. Created by the Investigators, 14 items ask parents to report the frequency with which they have engaged in target parenting practices related to bedtime in the past 4 weeks, on a 6-point scale (0=Never in past month; 5=Every day in past month); average scores range from 0 to 5, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Then parents are asked to rate how confident they are in doing 12 of these target parenting practices, on a 10-point scale (1=Not at all confident; 10=Highly confident); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Finally, 3 items ask parents for their satisfaction with how child's bedtime is going, on a 10-point scale (0=Not at all satisfied; 10=Very satisfied); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Program-Targeted Parenting Practices - Self-Efficacy of Practice Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Frequency of parents' engagement in the parenting practices targeted by the intervention, and parents' self-efficacy for doing so, are measured by the Program-Targeted Parenting Practices measure. Created by the Investigators, 14 items ask parents to report the frequency with which they have engaged in target parenting practices related to bedtime in the past 4 weeks, on a 6-point scale (0=Never in past month; 5=Every day in past month); average scores range from 0 to 5, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Then parents are asked to rate how confident they are in doing 12 of these target parenting practices, on a 10-point scale (1=Not at all confident; 10=Highly confident); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Finally, 3 items ask parents for their satisfaction with how child's bedtime is going, on a 10-point scale (0=Not at all satisfied; 10=Very satisfied); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Program-Targeted Parenting Practices - Satisfaction Handling Bedtime Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Frequency of parents' engagement in the parenting practices targeted by the intervention, and parents' self-efficacy for doing so, are measured by the Program-Targeted Parenting Practices measure. Created by the Investigators, 14 items ask parents to report the frequency with which they have engaged in target parenting practices related to bedtime in the past 4 weeks, on a 6-point scale (0=Never in past month; 5=Every day in past month); average scores range from 0 to 5, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Then parents are asked to rate how confident they are in doing 12 of these target parenting practices, on a 10-point scale (1=Not at all confident; 10=Highly confident); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes. Finally, 3 items ask parents for their satisfaction with how child's bedtime is going, on a 10-point scale (0=Not at all satisfied; 10=Very satisfied); average scores range from 1 to 10, higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS) - Closeness Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS-SF) is used to measure the degree of closeness and conflict in the parent-child relationship. The CPRS-SF is comprised of 15 parent-report items that ask the parent for their assessment of the child-parent relationship, the child's emotional stance toward the parent, and the parent's feelings toward the child. Two subscales are derived: Conflicts and Positive Aspects/Closeness. The Conflicts subscale is measured by 7 items on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely does not apply; 5=Definitely applies); average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Closeness subscale is measured with 7 items on the same 5-point scale; average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The CPRS-SF has been validated with parents of preschoolers and first graders and shows good internal consistency.

Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS) - Parent-Child Conflict Subscale

时间窗: Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

The Child-Parent Relationship Scale - Short Form (CPRS-SF) is used to measure the degree of closeness and conflict in the parent-child relationship. The CPRS-SF is comprised of 15 parent-report items that ask the parent for their assessment of the child-parent relationship, the child's emotional stance toward the parent, and the parent's feelings toward the child. Two subscales are derived: Conflicts and Positive Aspects/Closeness. The Conflicts subscale is measured by 7 items on a 5-point scale (1=Definitely does not apply; 5=Definitely applies); average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. The Closeness subscale is measured with 7 items on the same 5-point scale; average scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. The CPRS-SF has been validated with parents of preschoolers and first graders and shows good internal consistency.

System Usability Scale (SUS)

时间窗: At 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Skill usability is measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS), a commonly used 10-item scale that measures subjective perceptions of usability. Items are answered on a 5-point scale (1=Strongly disagree; 5=Strongly agree). The value of one is subtracted from odd numbered items (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) and the even number items (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) are subtracted from the value of five. Scores are then summed and multiplied by 2.5 resulting in scores on a scale that ranges from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better usability.

Program Acceptability

时间窗: At 4 weeks after baseline (T2)

Program acceptability was measured with 7 items at T2, 4 weeks after baseline, asking the extent to which primary parents found the Talk Parenting skill useful, enjoyable, whether it addressed important topics, helped make bedtime more positive, enjoyment of use by child, how much use of bedtime strategies, and how much bedtime strategies helped the child and family. Respondents answer items on a 7-point scale (1=Not at all; 7=Very much); average scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.

次要结局

  • Families' Usage of the Talk Parenting (TP) Skill - Number of Times Skill Was Used(At 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index (SEPTI) - Toddler Scale - Discipline Subscale(Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index (SEPTI) - Toddler Scale - Routine Subscale(Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Parental Stress Scale (PSS)(Baseline (T1), 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Families' Usage of the Talk Parenting (TP) Skill - Number of Families That Activated the Skill(At 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Families' Usage of the Talk Parenting (TP) Skill - Number of Steps Used(At 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Families' Usage of the Talk Parenting (TP) Skill - Length of Bedtime Routine(At 4 weeks after baseline (T2))
  • Families' Usage of the Talk Parenting (TP) Skill - Listened to a Podcast(At 4 weeks after baseline (T2))

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验