Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine Versus Midazolam in Endoscopic Procedures
- Conditions
- Sedation and Analgesia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04597268
- Lead Sponsor
- National Cancer Institute, Egypt
- Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine versus midazolam combined with propofol in cancer patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
- Detailed Description
Comparison between using intravenous (IV) propofol combined with either IV dexmedetomidine or IV ketamine or IV midazolam; to study the effect of their combination on level of sedation and hemodynamic stability on adult patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
- patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures
- ≥ Age 18 years
- ASA I-II
- Allergy to any of the used drugs
- impaired renal or liver functions
- hypertensive patients
- patients with cardiovascular
- cerebrovascular disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Midazolam Midazolam IV midazolam dexmedetomidine Dexmedetomidine IV dexmedetomidine ketamine Ketamine IV ketamine
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ramsy sedation score (RSS) 3 to 6 months time to achievement of Ramsy sedation score (RSS) 3-4, Ramsy sedation scale score from 1 to 6, 1 meaning anxious and 6 meaning no response to stimulus
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Walaa Y Elsabeeny
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt