MedPath

Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine Versus Midazolam in Endoscopic Procedures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Sedation and Analgesia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04597268
Lead Sponsor
National Cancer Institute, Egypt
Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine versus midazolam combined with propofol in cancer patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Detailed Description

Comparison between using intravenous (IV) propofol combined with either IV dexmedetomidine or IV ketamine or IV midazolam; to study the effect of their combination on level of sedation and hemodynamic stability on adult patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
75
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients scheduled for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures
  • ≥ Age 18 years
  • ASA I-II
Exclusion Criteria
  • Allergy to any of the used drugs
  • impaired renal or liver functions
  • hypertensive patients
  • patients with cardiovascular
  • cerebrovascular disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MidazolamMidazolamIV midazolam
dexmedetomidineDexmedetomidineIV dexmedetomidine
ketamineKetamineIV ketamine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ramsy sedation score (RSS)3 to 6 months

time to achievement of Ramsy sedation score (RSS) 3-4, Ramsy sedation scale score from 1 to 6, 1 meaning anxious and 6 meaning no response to stimulus

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Walaa Y Elsabeeny

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath