Supermicrosurgical Lymphatic Venous Anastomosis for Lymphedema Treatment
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- survival or failure
研究概览
简要总结
LVA orientations such as lymphaticovenous end-to-end (LVEEA), end-to-side (LVESA), and side-to-end (LVSEA) are commonly performed. Each orientation has its own advantages and disadvantages. The key factors affecting the type of anastomotic orientation are the sizes of the LVs and the RVs, and the relative distance between them. Most published literatures have focused on LVSEA2-9, which is considered to be the most efficient. With one anastomosis in LVSEA, the RV is able to drain both the antegrade and retrograde lymphatic flow. Nevertheless, how to determine the anastomotic orientation has remained ambiguous. In this study, we aimed to establish the basis of selecting the proper anastomotic orientation, based on the size and comparative size discrepancy between LV and RV. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to focus on this subject.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •lymphedematous lower limbs (International Society of Lymphology stage I-III) between March 2016 to October 2018 were included
排除标准
- •Patients whose data were missing will be excluded.
结局指标
主要结局
survival or failure
时间窗: up to 3 months
The primary free flap outcome was determined as its survival or failure.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
