跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04285762
NCT04285762已完成不适用

Supermicrosurgical Lymphatic Venous Anastomosis for Lymphedema Treatment

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2018年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
survival or failure

研究概览

简要总结

LVA orientations such as lymphaticovenous end-to-end (LVEEA), end-to-side (LVESA), and side-to-end (LVSEA) are commonly performed. Each orientation has its own advantages and disadvantages. The key factors affecting the type of anastomotic orientation are the sizes of the LVs and the RVs, and the relative distance between them. Most published literatures have focused on LVSEA2-9, which is considered to be the most efficient. With one anastomosis in LVSEA, the RV is able to drain both the antegrade and retrograde lymphatic flow. Nevertheless, how to determine the anastomotic orientation has remained ambiguous. In this study, we aimed to establish the basis of selecting the proper anastomotic orientation, based on the size and comparative size discrepancy between LV and RV. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to focus on this subject.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • lymphedematous lower limbs (International Society of Lymphology stage I-III) between March 2016 to October 2018 were included

排除标准

  • Patients whose data were missing will be excluded.

结局指标

主要结局

survival or failure

时间窗: up to 3 months

The primary free flap outcome was determined as its survival or failure.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Supermicrosurgical LVA for Lymphedema Treatment | 临床试验