MedPath

In Situ Caries of Fluoride Toothpastes

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Healthy Subjects
Partial Denture Wearers
Caries
Interventions
Drug: Sodium fluoride toothpaste
Drug: Placebo toothpaste
Registration Number
NCT00708123
Lead Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Brief Summary

This study is to evaluate the effect of fluoride dentifrices on enamel with artificial caries lesions in an in situ model.

Detailed Description

Topical fluorides have been proven to be clinically effective in the prevention of dental caries. It is generally agreed that anti-caries effect of fluoride (F) is mainly by decreasing the rate of enamel demineralization and enhancing the rate of enamel remineralization. An in-situ Surface Micro-hardness (SMH) test is widely used to evaluate enamel demineralization and remineralization during the caries process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of toothpaste formulations containing fluoride from different sources \[sodium fluoride (NaF) and sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP)\] using an in situ caries model.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sodium Fluoride (NaF) toothpaste[1350 parts per million(ppm)F]Sodium fluoride toothpasteParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF toothpaste (1350 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaF/Carbopol toothpaste (1400 ppm F)Sodium fluoride toothpasteParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF and 0.5% carbopol toothpaste (1450 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaMFP/NaF toothpaste (1450 ppm F)Sodium fluoride toothpasteParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaMFPand NaF toothpaste (1450 ppm F - 1000 ppm F as NaMFP and 450 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
NaF toothpaste (250 ppm F)Sodium fluoride toothpasteParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of NaF toothpaste (250 ppm F as NaF) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
Placebo toothpaste (0 ppm F)Placebo toothpasteParticipants to brush their natural teeth twice daily with a full ribbon of fluoride free toothpaste (0 ppm F) for one timed minute, after removing their partial denture from their mouth.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Percentage Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) of Enamel Specimens Exposed to NaF/Carbopol Toothpaste (1400 ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (1350ppmF) Compared to NaMFP/NaF Toothpaste (1450ppmF)Baseline to 14 days

%SMHR test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. %SMHR was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. %SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: \[(D-R)/ (D-B)\]\*100.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean %SMHR of Enamel Specimens Exposed to NaF/Carbopol Toothpaste (1400 ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (1350ppmF), NaMFP/NaF Toothpaste (1450ppmF), NaF Toothpaste (250ppmF) and Placebo Toothpaste (0ppmF)Baseline to 14 days

%SMHR test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. %SMHR was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. %SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: \[(D-R)/ (D-B)\]\*100.

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Enamel Fluoride UptakeBaseline to 14 days

Enamel fluoride uptake was determined using the microdrill enamel biopsy technique. The amount of fluoride uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride (F) divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as ug F/cm2. The difference between treatments was calculated with respect to fluoride uptake by enamel.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath