A comparison between two analgesia method in patients with upper extremity injury
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- IRCT201202289162N1
- Lead Sponsor
- AJA University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
Inclusion Criteria
patients with upper exterimity trauma; in need of analgesia; time of admission during years 2012 and 2013; place of admission Imam Khomeini and Beesat hospital, Tehran, Iran
exclusion criteria:history of seizure; known allergy to analgesic substances; peripheral vascular disease; sickle cell anemia; AV fistula in upper exterimity; upper exterimity infection; procedures that lasts more than one hour; patients who need emergent intervention
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method evel of analgesia. Timepoint: after performance of sedation method. Method of measurement: NSR (numerical scaling rate).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Satisfaction. Timepoint: after performance of sedation method. Method of measurement: five benchmark value.;Complications. Timepoint: after procedural sedation. Method of measurement: qualitative value.;Hemodynamic changes (pulse rate, mean arterial pressure). Timepoint: before and after procedural sedation, before initiation of prosedure, at the end of procedure, at the time of discharge. Method of measurement: cardiac monitoring.