跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/01/079449
CTRI/2025/01/079449招募中4 期

Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Conventional Floss, Expandable Floss and Dental Tape in Removing Interproximal Plaque- A Clinical Study

Monica Antony1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2025年9月30日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
48
试验地点
1
主要终点
To evaluate and compare the efficiency of conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape in reduction of interproximal plaque scores and gingival inflammation

研究概览

简要总结

It is generally accepted that bacterial plaque is an important etiological factor of periodontal

diseases. Despite recent advances in dentistry, mechanical removal of plaque remains the

primary method. But the use of toothbrush alone does not serve the purpose of removing

plaque which demands the use of some adjuncts such as proximal cleaning aids. Some of

the proximal aids include dental floss, interdental brush, toothpicks, dental tape etc. A total

of 48 subjects were divided into 3 groups, 16 in each group and the flosses were distributed

randomly among the groups to determine the plaque removal efficiency of each. The

patients were recalled at week 2,4,6, and 8. At each visit, the following indices were

assessed: gingival index, papillary bleeding index and Rustogi modified Navy Plaque

index. The load bearing capacity of the floss was tested with the universal testing machine

and the anti-shred property of the flosses were checked using the stereo microscope. There

are fewer studies comparing the effectiveness and anti- shred property of conventional

floss, expandable floss and dental tape. Not much information is present regarding dental

tape probably due to the assumed similarity between conventional floss and dental tape.

This study aims to compare the interproximal plaque removal efficiency between

conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 55.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Subjects between the age group 18-55 years
  • Moderate to severe gingivitis
  • Type I embrasures
  • Subjects with plaque scores between 0.1-0.9
  • Minimum 15 teeth present
  • Systemically healthy patients.

排除标准

  • Subjects with periodontal disease.
  • Grossly decayed teeth, proximal caries
  • Teeth with fracture, erosion, crack
  • Undergoing orthodontic treatment
  • Subjects using tobacco
  • Teeth with crowns and proximal restorations
  • patients with dental implants
  • patients with developmental and hand dexterity problems.

结局指标

主要结局

To evaluate and compare the efficiency of conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape in reduction of interproximal plaque scores and gingival inflammation

时间窗: 2,4,6,8 weeks

次要结局

  • To evaluate and compare the anti-shred property and tensile load capacity of conventional floss,(expandable floss and dental tape)

研究者

发起方
Monica Antony
申办方类型
Other [Self ]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Monica Antony

Post graduate student at Yenepoya dental college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验