Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Conventional Floss, Expandable Floss and Dental Tape in Removing Interproximal Plaque- A Clinical Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 48
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate and compare the efficiency of conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape in reduction of interproximal plaque scores and gingival inflammation
研究概览
简要总结
It is generally accepted that bacterial plaque is an important etiological factor of periodontal
diseases. Despite recent advances in dentistry, mechanical removal of plaque remains the
primary method. But the use of toothbrush alone does not serve the purpose of removing
plaque which demands the use of some adjuncts such as proximal cleaning aids. Some of
the proximal aids include dental floss, interdental brush, toothpicks, dental tape etc. A total
of 48 subjects were divided into 3 groups, 16 in each group and the flosses were distributed
randomly among the groups to determine the plaque removal efficiency of each. The
patients were recalled at week 2,4,6, and 8. At each visit, the following indices were
assessed: gingival index, papillary bleeding index and Rustogi modified Navy Plaque
index. The load bearing capacity of the floss was tested with the universal testing machine
and the anti-shred property of the flosses were checked using the stereo microscope. There
are fewer studies comparing the effectiveness and anti- shred property of conventional
floss, expandable floss and dental tape. Not much information is present regarding dental
tape probably due to the assumed similarity between conventional floss and dental tape.
This study aims to compare the interproximal plaque removal efficiency between
conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 55.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Subjects between the age group 18-55 years
- •Moderate to severe gingivitis
- •Type I embrasures
- •Subjects with plaque scores between 0.1-0.9
- •Minimum 15 teeth present
- •Systemically healthy patients.
排除标准
- •Subjects with periodontal disease.
- •Grossly decayed teeth, proximal caries
- •Teeth with fracture, erosion, crack
- •Undergoing orthodontic treatment
- •Subjects using tobacco
- •Teeth with crowns and proximal restorations
- •patients with dental implants
- •patients with developmental and hand dexterity problems.
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate and compare the efficiency of conventional floss, expandable floss and dental tape in reduction of interproximal plaque scores and gingival inflammation
时间窗: 2,4,6,8 weeks
次要结局
- To evaluate and compare the anti-shred property and tensile load capacity of conventional floss,(expandable floss and dental tape)
研究者
Monica Antony
Post graduate student at Yenepoya dental college
