MedPath

Low-contrast Dose Liver CT Using Lean Body Weight Low Monoenergetic Images and Deep Learning-based Reconstruction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Body Weight
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Interventions
Other: low dose CT contrast media - lean body weight
Other: Standard dose CT contrast media
Registration Number
NCT04027556
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

This study aims to assess whether the acceptable image quality is achievable using low monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT with deep learning-based denoising, and low contrast media dose calculated based on lean body weight for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Detailed Description

The use of iodinated contrast media in CT is associated with an immediate hypersensitivity reaction in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, it is important to reduce the contrast dose for CT exams in patients who are required repeated CT examinations, including patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Low monoenergetic images of dual-energy CT can provide higher iodine contrast than conventional images, thus enabling reduction of contrast media. The high image noise in low monoenergetic images may be improved by using model-based IR techniques and deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithms. Besides, lean body weight (LBW)-based contrast dose determination can be another option to reduce contrast media dose compared with total body weight-based dose determination since the volumes of blood and liver are not strictly proportional to total body weight. Therefore, we surmised that 50 keV images reconstructed with DLD algorithms with reducing iodine load by 30% based on LBW could produce the comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity compared with standard iodine-dose 120kVp images.

In this single-center prospective, randomized clinical trial, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of low-contrast dose CT using 50 keV and DLD technique compared with the standard contrast-dose protocol using model-based IR in patients at high risk of HCC.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • High risk group for developing HCC
  • Scheduled contrast-enhanced CT for HCC diagnosis or surveillance
Exclusion Criteria
  • not a high risk group for developing HCC
  • body mass index is equal to or larger than 30 kg/m^2
  • suspected HCC > 5cm in diameter
  • received locoregional treatment or surgery for HCC within 3 months
  • congestive hepatopathy
  • no venous access on forearm
  • anticipated beam hardening artifact due to prosthesis
  • relative/absolute contraindication of contrast-enhanced CT

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
50 keV DLD images of the LBW-based low-dose grouplow dose CT contrast media - lean body weightLow CT contrast media dose calculated based on lean body weight and low monoenergetic images of dual-energy CT with deep learning-based denoising
ADMIRE images of the standard-contrast dose groupStandard dose CT contrast mediaStandard CT contrast media dose calculated based on total body weight and conventional images with full model-based iterative reconstruction
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
HCC conspicuity6 months after complete enrollment

qualitative scoring for focal lesion depiction on four-point scale (1: worst, 4: excellent, representative value is average score)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Image contrast12 months after complete enrollment

qualitative scoring for image contrast on four-point scale (1: worst, 4: excellent, representative value is average score)

Lesion detection12 months after complete enrollment

assessment of focal liver lesion (HCC) on CT according to Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)

Hounsfield unit3 months after complete enrollment

measurement of hounsfield unit in aorta, portal vein, liver parenchyma, and paraspinal muscles

Image noise12 months after complete enrollment

qualitative scoring for image noise on four-point scale (1: worst, 4: excellent, representative value is average score)

Contrast media dose3 months after complete enrollment

administered contrast media dose in each group

Overall image quality6 months after complete enrollment

qualitative scoring for image quality on four-point scale (1: worst, 4: excellent, representative value is average score)

Radiation dose3 months after complete enrollment

measured radiation dose in each group

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath