MedPath

A Safety and Efficacy Study of AGN-214868 in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia

Phase 2
Terminated
Conditions
Neuralgia, Postherpetic
Interventions
Drug: AGN-214868
Drug: AGN-214868 Placebo (Vehicle)
Registration Number
NCT01678924
Lead Sponsor
Allergan
Brief Summary

This is a safety and efficacy study of AGN-214868 in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
280
Inclusion Criteria
  • Postherpetic neuralgia with pain present for at least 9 months
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Active herpes zoster skin rash
  • Anticipated treatment for postherpetic neuralgia during the first 3 months of the study, including oral and topical medications, acupuncture, spinal cord stimulation, transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS), or trigger point injection
  • Anticipated treatment with pain medication for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia during the first 3 months of the study
  • Use of capsaicin treatment for postherpetic neuralgia within 6 months, or anticipated use during the first 3 months of the study
  • Use of botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason within 6 months, or anticipated use during the study
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AGN-214868 Dose 2AGN-214868AGN-214868 Dose 2 given as injections into the area of pain on Day 1.
AGN-214868 Placebo (Vehicle)AGN-214868 Placebo (Vehicle)AGN-214868 placebo (vehicle) given as injections into the area of pain on Day 1.
AGN-214868 Dose 3AGN-214868AGN-214868 Dose 3 given as injections into the area of pain on Day 1.
AGN-214868 Dose 1AGN-214868AGN-214868 Dose 1 given as injections into the area of pain on Day 1.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 1Baseline to Week 12

The average pain intensity score at each week was the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported in the patient's eDiary during each 7-day period, starting with the day of study treatment injection. Patients used the 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" Baseline was defined as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported during the baseline period for the 7 days immediately prior to the treatment.

Change From Baseline in Average Pain Intensity Score - Cohort 2Baseline to Week 12

The average pain intensity score at each week was the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported in the patient's eDiary during each 7-day period, starting with the day of study treatment injection. patients used the 11-point Likert scale, with anchors at 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "pain as bad as you can imagine" Baseline was defined as the mean of the daily average pain intensity scores reported during the baseline period for the 7 days immediately prior to the treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 1Baseline to Week 1

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 3Baseline to Week 3

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease), and in 10% increments, up to 100% improvement, in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 9Baseline to Week 9

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 5Baseline to Week 5

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 6Baseline to Week 6

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 7Baseline to Week 7

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 10Baseline to Week 10

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 1Baseline to Week 1

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 3Baseline to Week 3

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 11Baseline to Week 11

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 1 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 1 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 2 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 2 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 5Baseline to Week 5

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 6Baseline to Week 6

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 7Baseline to Week 7

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 9Baseline to Week 9

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 10Baseline to Week 10

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 11Baseline to Week 11

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia Cohort 1 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Percentage of Average Pain Intensity Score Responders - Cohort 2 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

Average Pain Intensity Score Responder is defined as a patient who had at least a 30% improvement (decrease) in average pain intensity score at each week compared with baseline

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient and that the patient was asked to circle their MASP on with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 2 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Maximal Area of Spontaneous Pain - Cohort 2 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

The assessment of maximal area of spontaneous pain (MASP) was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their MASP with a black marker. Areas of pain were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 1 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 1 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

The assessment of maximal area of allodynia was conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). This assessment is based on color photographs taken of the patient in which the patient was asked to outline their maximal area of skin that feels unpleasant to the touch (allodynic skin) with a red marker. Areas of allodynia were quantified at a central reading center.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia Cohort 1 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia Cohort 1 - Week 8Baseline to Week 8

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 4Baseline to Week 4

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 12Baseline to Week 12

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Change From Baseline in Evoked Pain Score in the Area of Allodynia - Cohort 2 - Week 2Baseline to Week 2

Assessment of evoked pain were conducted by a qualified and trained investigator or designee (eg, physician, physician's assistant, nurse practitioner, and nurse). Evoked pain was scored using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to100 mm scale with anchors of 0 = No pain and 100 = Worst pain imaginable). The patient was asked to use the VAS to rate the unpleasantness of 3 brush strokes within the center of the area of allodynia and pain.

Trial Locations

Locations (68)

NZOZ Neuro-Kard

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poland

University of California, Irvine

🇺🇸

Irvine, California, United States

Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien

🇦🇹

Wien, Austria

Schmerzklinik Kiel

🇩🇪

Kiel, Germany

Bochum Research Centre

🇩🇪

Bochum, Germany

Beacon Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Omega Medical Research

🇺🇸

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Frankfurt Research Centre

🇩🇪

Frankfurt, Germany

Neuro-Pain Medical Center

🇺🇸

Fresno, California, United States

Nzoz Neuromed

🇵🇱

Lublin, Poland

Springfield Neurology Associates, LLC

🇺🇸

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Das Schmerzzentrum Celle

🇩🇪

Celle, Germany

Plains Medical Clinic

🇺🇸

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Klinikum Hanau GmbH

🇩🇪

Hanau, Germany

Medica Pro Familia Sp. Z.o.o SKA

🇵🇱

Katowice, Poland

Territory Neurology & Research Institute

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Millennium Pain Center

🇺🇸

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Ambulant study centre

🇩🇪

Cologne, Germany

Facharzt fur Neurologie

🇩🇪

Hoppegarten, Germany

SMZ-Ost Donauspital

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

Osrodek Badan Klinicznych Euromedis Sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Szczecin, Poland

Medica Pro Familia Warszawa

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Injury Care Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Boise, Idaho, United States

Regionales Schmerz- und Palliativ Zentrum DGS Mainz

🇩🇪

Mainz, Germany

Neuro-Consil GmbH

🇩🇪

Düsseldorf, Germany

Magdeburg Research Centre

🇩🇪

Magdeburg, Germany

Poznański Ośrodek Medyczny NOVAMED

🇵🇱

Poznan, Poznañ, Poland

Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne S.C.

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Clinical Research of Charleston

🇺🇸

Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Neurologische Praxis Heidenheim

🇩🇪

Heidenheim, Germany

Schmerz und Palliativ- Zentrum Goeppingen

🇩🇪

Goeppingen, Germany

Regionales Schmerzzentrum DGS

🇩🇪

Bielefeld, Germany

Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej

🇵🇱

Swidnik, Poland

Pro scientia med im MARE Klinikum

🇩🇪

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

COR Clinical Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Schmerztherapiezentrum Villingen-Schwenningen

🇩🇪

Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany

Agave Clinical Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Alpine Clinical Research Center

🇺🇸

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Riverside Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Drug Studies America

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Quest Research Institute

🇺🇸

Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States

AKH Wien

🇦🇹

Wien, Austria

Clinvest Headache Care Center

🇺🇸

Springfield, Missouri, United States

MultiCare Neuroscience Center of Washington

🇺🇸

Tacoma, Washington, United States

The Medical Research Network, LLC

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Albuquerque Neuroscience, Inc.

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Allegheny Pain Management

🇺🇸

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Leiter des Universitats Schmerz Centrums (USC)

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Schmerz und Palliativzentrum Fulda

🇩🇪

Fulda, Germany

Specjalistyczny Gabinet Neurologiczny

🇵🇱

Krakow, Poland

Medamed GmbH

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Germany

Przychodnia Specjalistyczna PROSEN

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

Synexus SCM sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Poland

Loma Linda University

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

Island Neurological Associates, P.C.

🇺🇸

Plainview, New York, United States

Neurological Research Institute

🇺🇸

Santa Monica, California, United States

Wake Research Associates

🇺🇸

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Center for Clinical Studies

🇺🇸

Webster, Texas, United States

Leipzig Research Centre

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Germany

Berlin Research Centre

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Universitätsklinik Ulm

🇩🇪

Ulm, Germany

Northern California Research Corp

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Compass Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Orlando, Florida, United States

Michigan Head Pain and Neurology Institute

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Center for Pharmaceutical Research

🇺🇸

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Clinical Trials of South Carolina, LLC

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

The Mile High Research Center

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

PharmaCorp Clinical Trials, Inc

🇺🇸

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath