MedPath

Comparison of Hemodynamic Response of Dexmedetomidine versus Additional Intravenous Lidocaine with Propofol during Tracheal Intubatio

Phase 3
Conditions
Intubation
Propofol&#44
Hemodynamic Response of Dexmedetomidine versus Additional Intravenous Lidocaine with Propofol during Tracheal Intubation.
Dexmedetomidine&#44
Lidocaine&#44
Hemodynamic response&#44
Registration Number
TCTR20190206002
Lead Sponsor
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
106
Inclusion Criteria

Aged between 18-65 years
ASA physical status I-II undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia
Weighing between 40 †80 kg
BMI between 18 †24.99 kg/m2
Mallampati Classification grade I - II

Exclusion Criteria

Patient with coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease
Hypertension
Pregnancy
Emergency surgery
Full stomach

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate at preinduction, one minute after induction, two minute after induction, intubation phase, one minut mmHg, per minute
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Complication: hypotension, bradycardia at the end of intervention number and percentage
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath