Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01249742
NCT01249742
Completed
Not Applicable

Sugarsquare. Focus on the Adolescent: Digital Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Through the Internet

Radboud University Medical Center1 site in 1 country65 target enrollmentFebruary 2009

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Enrollment
65
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Patients' Evaluation of Quality of Care
Status
Completed
Last Updated
15 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Background

The treatment of diabetes is multidisciplinary. Alignment of care of the various professional disciplines is, however, not always optimal. This can lead to confusion about treatment interventions and behavioral advices. In adolescence, good fine-tuned care is of extreme importance because of the difficulties in regulation of the disease in this phase of life (Snoek, 2004). These difficulties are due to biological changes but also to socio-psychological developmental changes. The adolescents' psychological development demands more autonomy and responsibility for the diabetes (care) by the adolescent. The social development can conflict with the treatment regime, because of the adolescents' social needs (ADA, 2001; Houdijk, 1998; Snoek, 2004). In this study the investigators assess whether an interactive website, on which adolescents with diabetes and their treatment team can communicate, leads to better alignment of care and better control over the disease.

Intervention

The diabetes has great impact on the adolescents' everyday life. Finding a balance between more autonomy, participating in social life with (healthy) peers and control of the disease is difficult and seems to act as a thread during this phase in life.

This can lead to questions and uncertainty at any given moment. The interactive website provides the adolescent access to information and to his or her individual treatment plan and advices fitted to his or her condition and life. The adolescent can pose questions at any given moment through the online forum and their personal treatment page. Since the treatment team answers the question within a day, fit between diabetes care and adolescents' everyday life is optimized.

Research question

Does an online interactive treatment environment, on which adolescents with diabetes can communicate with their treatment team, lead to better fit of care and to better disease control?

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2009
End Date
November 2010
Last Updated
15 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adolescents aged 12 and older;
  • diagnosed with diabetes mellitus;
  • receiving regular outpatient hospital-delivered diabetes care provided by the Children's Diabetes Center Nijmegen (CDCN)

Exclusion Criteria

  • adolescents who were unable to read questionnaires because of language, or cognitive problems were excluded

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patients' Evaluation of Quality of Care

Time Frame: T0: baseline (1 month prior to acces to intervention); T1: (6 months following T0); T2: (12 months following T0).

Participants' appreciation of our diabetes care was assessed using the Patients' Evaluation of Quality of Diabetes care (PEQ-D; Pouwer \& Snoek, 2002). This questionnaire consists of 14 items, such as: 'The amount of information I receive from the doctor is...'. The adolescent is asked to answer by means of a 5-point lykert scale varying from 1) bad to 5) excellent.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Adolescents' disease knowledge(T0: baseline (1 month prior to acces to intervention); T1: (6 months following T0); T2: (12 months following T0).)
  • Health Related Quality of Life(T0: baseline (1 month prior to acces to intervention); T1: (6 months following T0); T2: (12 months following T0).)
  • Confidence In Diabetes Selfcare(T0: baseline (1 month prior to acces to intervention); T1: (6 months following T0); T2: (12 months following T0).)
  • Glycemic control (HbA1c)(T0: baseline (1 month prior to acces to intervention); T1: (6 months following T0); T2: (12 months following T0).)
  • Degree of use of intervention(T1 (6 months following start of intervention))

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials