MedPath

Effect of Modulated Auditory Stimulation on Interaural Auditory Perception

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Interventions
Other: Auditory intervention filter-modulated group
Registration Number
NCT05441891
Lead Sponsor
University of Alcala
Brief Summary

This study analyzes the effect of an equalizer-modulated auditory intervention on the asymmetry of interaural auditory perception in groups with different emotional states such as well-being, anxiety, depression and mixed anxiety-depression.

Detailed Description

The present study follows a randomized, double-blind (investigator and outcome assessor), parallel and controlled design. The auditory intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not received any intervention. These subjects follow the same evaluation and data collection process.

Once randomized, all participants will make a first control visit in which a pure-tone audiometry was carry out and completed the various psychiatric evaluation tests to classify into different groups: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, nationality, education, working status, noise exposure, use of ear protection, and present or past use of any analgesic, anxiolytic or antidepressant for longer than a week).

The study variables collected at 3 months were pure-tone audiometry (air conduction).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
233
Inclusion Criteria
  • Recruited from Health Centre Mejorada del Campo (Madrid, Spain)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Having significant hearing loss
  • Having acute otological process
  • Having psychotic disease
  • Having epilepsy
  • Having serious illness
  • Having pregnancy
  • Used to try alcohol or drugs

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Auditory intervention filter-modulatedAuditory intervention filter-modulated groupParticipants assigned to this group listened classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 125 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 125 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 250 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 250 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 750 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 750 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 2000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 2000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 3000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 3000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 4000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 4000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 6000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 6000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 8000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 months

Minimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 8000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Anxiety and depression level on the Goldberg scaleOne month

To discriminate between these two entities. The following cut-off points were used: a total Anxiety score \> 4 detects 73% of all cases of anxiety; a total Depression score \>3 detects 82% of all cases of depression

Anxiety level on the Hamilton scaleOne month

It is a clinician-administered scale on which each item is rated from 0 to 4. It yields a score in the range of 0 to 56. The following cut-off points were used: 0-5 points (No anxiety), \>5 points (Anxiety).

Depression level on the Hamilton scaleOne month

Each item is rated on a three- or five-point scale, with a score from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, respectively. It yields a total score in the range of 0 to 52. The following cut-off points were used to assess depression: No depression: 0-7; Depression: \>7

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 125 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 250 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 500 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 750 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1500 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 2000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 3000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 4000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 6000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 8000 HzThree months between the first and second measure

Ratio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Alcalá

🇪🇸

Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath