CTRI/2013/09/003944
Active, not recruiting
Phase 4
A prospective, comparative, controlled, randomized, open label, parallel, 3-arm study to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Troxipide (100 mg) and Rabeprazole (20 mg) alone and in combination in patients suffering from acid peptic disorders - TRO/RAB/11/2011
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Acid Peptic Disorder
- Sponsor
- Government Medical College Hospital
- Enrollment
- 100
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with symptoms of dyspepsia having Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score \> 2
- •Patients undergoing upper gastro intestinal endoscopy having signs of any of acid peptic disorder
- •Subjects who provide a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of any diagnosed gastrointestinal disorder other than acid peptic disorder
- •History of any previous abdominal / gastrointestinal surgery
- •History of treatment with drugs capable of interfering with digestive mucosal integrity, acid secretion or gastrointestinal motility, (including H2 receptor antagonists, NSAIDs, muscarinic antagonists, cytoprotective agents) within the previous 7 daysys
- •Requires concomitant medication which precludes the evaluation of study medications
- •Patients with signs suggestive of any acute complication of acid peptic disorder
- •Any contraindication for endoscopy examination
- •Evidence of gastric malignancy, pyloric obstruction, or oesophageal stricture on endoscopy
- •Patients who are drug or alcohol abusers
- •Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of the test / Comparator formulation
- •Patients with impairment of renal or hepatic function, severe cardiac disease, any respiratory disease or haematological abnormality
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Phase 4
A comparative clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of capsular tension ring.Health Condition 1: H259- Unspecified age-related cataractCTRI/2023/03/050397Grewal Eye Institute
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
A prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing RF- energy and cryoenergy in pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillatioI48.1Persistent atrial fibrillationDRKS00010840Medizinische Klinik IVStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe340
Completed
Not Applicable
A prospective,randomized,single-blind,comparative study of Inslow,palatinose-based liquid formula and Meibalance,standard balanced liquid formula,using viscera fat accumulation as a primary endpoint in adults patients with confirmed diagnosis of obesity and impaired glucose tolerance.Obesity and impaired glucose toleranceJPRN-UMIN000001301Meiji Dairies Corporation50
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Clinical trial to know the effect of Nasal spray of methylcobalamine versus oral B12 tablet versus standard of care (Iron and Folic Acid supplementation) in anaemic women.CTRI/2023/04/052112Dr Mukulesh Gupta
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
comparative study of forced air warmer, ondansetron or their combination on shivering during cesarean section under spinal anaesthesiaHealth Condition 1: null- pregnant women coming for lower segment cesarean sectionCTRI/2018/01/011412ESIC medical college and Hospitals