A study comparing two different types of suturing materials used in laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries.
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/06/069655
- Lead Sponsor
- Southern Railway Headquarters Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions, who are willing for the study.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Women with gynaecological malignancies
2. Immunocompromised patients
3. Morbidly obese patients
4. Unfit for surgery due to general condition
5. Participants not consenting for study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time taken for closure of vault intracorporealy between barbed and polyglactin 910 in total laparoscopic hysterectomyTimepoint: Baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cost difference between Barbed & Polyglactin 910Timepoint: Baseline;Incidence of Post Operative complications between Barbed suture & Polyglactin 910 like <br/ ><br>1 surgical site infection (vault) <br/ ><br>2 dyspareunia <br/ ><br>3 vault dehiscenceTimepoint: 4 weeks;Post operative pain between Barbed & Polyglactin 910 assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Timepoint: 24 hours & Day 3;Surgical difficulty in vault closure between Barbed & Polyglactin 910 assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Timepoint: Baseline