3 Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement: Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Robotic Assistance, Dynamic Navigation, and Static Guide
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Sponsor
- Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- Enrollment
- 45
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Peri-implant soft tissue health
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
For free hand dental implant placement, a key difficulty is to accurately control the position. Improving precision of dental implant placement is considered important for safety and efficacy of tooth replacement with dental implants. There are 3 available methods to improve implant position according to a digitally constructed prosthetically guided plan: the use of a 3D printed static guide, the use of a dynamic navigation system or the use of a robotic system. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction among three methods of digital guidance: the use of a 3D printed static guide, dynamic navigation, and robotic assisted surgery. Patients requiring single tooth replacement with a dental implant will be digitally planned using a CBCT and an intraoral digital scan. Subjects will be randomized to one of the three treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes.
Detailed Description
For free hand dental implant placement, a key difficulty is to accurately control the position. Improving precision of dental implant placement is considered important for safety and efficacy of tooth replacement with dental implants. There are 3 available methods to improve implant position according to a digitally constructed prosthetically guided plan: the use of a 3D printed static guide, the use of a dynamic navigation system or the use of a robotic system. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the positional implant accuracy, the surgical time, and patient satisfaction among three methods of digital guidance: the use of a 3D printed static guide, dynamic navigation, and robotic assisted surgery. Patients requiring single tooth replacement with a dental implant will be digitally planned using a CBCT and an intraoral digital scan. Subjects will be randomized to one of the three treatment modalities based on the plan. The accuracy of placement will be assessed evaluating the difference between the planned and the actual position using a follow-up scan taken at the end of the surgery. Platform deviation will be measured digitally. Subjects will be followed up for one year to assess both patient reported and professional outcomes and associate them with the precision of implant position.
Investigators
Maurizio Tonetti
Professor
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient with a single missing tooth, with sufficient bone volume and keratinized tissue at edentulous site, willing to comply with research appointments/schedule.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant at any point during the study duration; with any systematic diseases/conditions that are contradictions to dental implant treatment; inability or unwillingness of individual to give written informed consent; inability of follow-up according to the protocol.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Peri-implant soft tissue health
Time Frame: 12 month follow-up
Defined according to the peri-implant health case definition by Berglundh et al 2017 and the ID-COSM international consensus conference
Implant positional accuracy
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery
Implant accuracy will be measured as discrepancy between the digital plan and t actual position of the implant.
Secondary Outcomes
- Cytokine concentrations in PISF(12-months follow-up after delivery of crown)
- Surgery time(intraoperative)
- Pain perception(7 days after surgery)
- Patient preference(Immediately after surgery)
- Surgeon preference(Immediately after surgery)
- Esthetics of the restoration(12-months follow-up after delivery of crown)
- Submarginal microbiome(12-months follow-up after delivery of crown)