Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05017233
NCT05017233TerminatedNot Applicable

Spectral CT Clinical Trial Protocol

Philips (China) Investment CO., LTD3 sites in 1 country51 target enrollmentStarted: July 4, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
51
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Excellent and good rate of clinical imaging (score≥3)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expected effectiveness, ease of operation, stability, and safety of Spectral CT

Detailed Description

Under the premise of protecting subjects and ensuring the scientific nature of this study, Spectral CT was evaluated for its effectiveness, convenience, stability and safety under normal conditions by collecting clinical cases.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Recruit volunteers (ages 18 to 75);
  • •Negative pregnancy tests in women of childbearing age;
  • •Participants who agree to participate in this clinical trial and sign the informed consent;
  • •Enhanced scans require laboratory tests to confirm normal renal function.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Persons who do not have full capacity for civil conduct;
  • •Lactating women;
  • •People who are not suitable for enhanced scanning with iodine contrast agent;
  • •Patients whom the investigator considers inappropriate to participate in this clinical trial.

Arms & Interventions

Experimental group, all volunteer will be scanned.

Experimental

All participation accept Spectral CT scanning; No group;

Intervention: Spectral CT (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Excellent and good rate of clinical imaging (score≥3)

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Rated items 5 points Excellent image quality for diagnostic purposes, very satisfactory 4 points good image quality, can be used for diagnosis, satisfactory 3 points Image quality defects, do not affect the diagnosis, general 2. Unsatisfactory image quality, affecting diagnosis Poor image quality, undiagnosable, unsatisfactory

Secondary Outcomes

  • Common functions assessment(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
  • Convenience evaluation assessment(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
  • Machine function and stability assessment(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
  • Adverse events and serious adverse events(through study completion, an average of 1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials