Development of a Mobile App for an Executive Functioning Intervention for Adolescents

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms
• Interventions: Device: Behavioral/organizational skills intervention augmented with digital health application

• Registration Number: NCT04018794
• Lead Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco

Brief Summary

This study develops an initial prototype of a mobile tool that will support clinician-directed behavioral/organizational skills treatment for adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with input guided from key stakeholders.

Detailed Description

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood mental health disorders, affecting 7-9% of children and adolescents, and leading to substantial impairment in adolescence. Despite evidence suggesting that behavioral interventions are efficacious, approximately 40-60% of adolescents receiving behavioral treatment show little to no improvement and skills are rarely generalized beyond treatment sessions. Lack of adolescent motivation and engagement, between-session skills use, reward saliency, and family involvement are key contributors to these limited effects. Mobile digital health (dHealth) strategies and gamification techniques, offer unique opportunities for overcoming the barriers of treatments specific to ADHD by using interactive tools to reinforce in-vivo skill practice, providing opportunities for immediate reinforcement, and motivating adolescents with digital rewards. The primary goal of this study is to develop and preliminarily test the integration of a digital health tool into organizational/behavioral skills treatment for adolescents with ADHD by improving executive functioning skills, providing in-vivo skills reinforcement, and monitoring adolescents' skill utilization. The proposed research will use an iterative stakeholder-centered design to develop, refine, and preliminarily test a novel digital health tool, applied as an adjunct to behavioral treatment for adolescents with ADHD (ages 11-15). This includes focus groups with key stakeholders and an open preliminary feasibility trial and usability testing. Data collected from focus groups will inform what content and features could be developed to overcome challenges to adolescent engagement and parent involvement. During the open trial (N=20) we will assess intervention feasibility, usability, and acceptability. During and after the clinical trial, we will collect continuous feedback from users on the usability and utility of the tool. At the end of this study we will complete debugging and programming to maximize usability before a future larger clinical trial.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-07-09
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-07-11
• Study First Posted: 2019-07-15
• Study Start: 2019-09-30
• Primary Completion: 2020-09-01
• Study Completion: 2020-09-01
• Results First Submitted: 2021-10-20
• Results First Submitted QC: 2021-10-20
• Status Verified: 2021-11
• Results First Posted: 2021-11-19
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-11-19
• Last Update Posted: 2021-11-23

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 15

Inclusion Criteria

• 1. Youth ages of 11-14 years (6-8th grade) that are attending a participating school
• 2. referred by SMHP as a youth with apparent ADHD-related problems,
• 3. ≥6 symptoms (item score ≥2) of Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity on the pooled parent and teacher Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale
• 4. ≥3 on the Impairment Rating Scale by parent and teacher (cross-situational impairment)
• 5. Parent consent and adolescent assent must be provided; b)

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• 1. No presence of conditions that are incompatible with this study's treatment including: Parent or adolescent report of a prior diagnosis of either Autism Spectrum Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, a Dissociative Disorder, Severe visual or hearing impairment, severe language delay or intellectual impairment, or a Psychotic Disorder will be excluded. Rationale: Individuals with these disorders often have very dysregulated behavior and impairments that deviate from the focus of this study.
• 2. Adolescent is in all-day special education classes or if core classes not in regular education classrooms. Rationale: The vast majority of adolescent with ADHD are served in regular education classrooms and students in full-day self-contained classrooms often have different challenges than students in regular education.
• 3. Adolescent planning to change (start or stop) psychotropic medication. Note: Adolescents taking medication will be required to meet all entry criteria, including impairment criteria, thus indicating a need for the intervention. Adolescent taking medication for attention or behavior are eligible as long as their medication regimens are stable. Participating parents will also need to be able to read/speak English because all measures are in English, and the intervention will be conducted in English.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Behavioral/organizational skills intervention plus mobile app	Behavioral/organizational skills intervention augmented with digital health application	Behavioral/organizational skills intervention plus mobile application (16, 20-30 minute sessions, twice/weekly for 8 weeks)

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
System Usability Scale	at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)	10-item technology-agnostic scale assessing technology product usability. The total SUS score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher usability. SUS scores above 80 indicated good usability. The SUS has high internal consistency (α=.91) and high convergent validity with a separate rating of usability and user satisfaction (r=.8). The present study will assess system usability at post-treatment (month 3).
Post Stakeholder Feasibility and Usability Rating	at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)	8-item Stakeholder Feasibility and Usability Rating (SFUR) was used to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the overall feasibility and usability of the program. The SFUR score is a mean of all items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher feasibility and usability. This measure was developed for the present study. The present study will assess these feasibility ratings at post-treatment (month 3).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of California, San Francisco; 🇺🇸 San Francisco, California, United States