Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tears
- Registration Number
- NCT06394856
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .
- Detailed Description
accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 89
Inclusion Criteria
- full-thickness supraspinatus
- degenerative tears
- age range 40 :65
Exclusion Criteria
- subscapularis tear
- small and massive tears
- traumatic tears
- partial -thickness tear
- revisioin surgery
- glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method retear rate 3 years retear rate
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method time 3 years duration of operation
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie rotator cuff tear progression and repair outcomes in shoulder pathologies?
How does the modified double-row suture-bridge technique compare to classic methods in rotator cuff repair effectiveness and patient recovery rates?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict successful outcomes in double-row suture-bridge rotator cuff repair techniques?
What are the potential adverse events associated with modified double-row suture-bridge techniques for rotator cuff tears and their management strategies?
How do combination approaches involving suture-bridge techniques and biologics compare to standard-of-care treatments in rotator cuff repair?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
university Hospital
🇪🇬Sohag, Egypt
university Hospital🇪🇬Sohag, Egypt