Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06394856
NCT06394856CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques

Sohag University1 site in 1 country89 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
89
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
retear rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .

Detailed Description

accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •full-thickness supraspinatus
  • •degenerative tears
  • •age range 40 :65

Exclusion Criteria

  • •subscapularis tear
  • •small and massive tears
  • •traumatic tears
  • •partial -thickness tear
  • •revisioin surgery
  • •glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability

Arms & Interventions

knotless group

Active Comparator

rotator cuff repair with a modified knotless anchors

Intervention: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques (Procedure)

knot-tying group

Active Comparator

rotator cuff repair with classic knot-tying double-row suture bridge technique by classic anchors

Intervention: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

retear rate

Time Frame: 3 years

retear rate

Secondary Outcomes

  • time(3 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hossam Eldin Mohamed Ahmed ElAzab

assistant professor orthopedic department

Sohag University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials