Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement: A Multicenter Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Implant
- Sponsor
- Aula Dental Avanzada
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by intraoral scan and planning software)
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 9 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism.
The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.
Investigators
Jose Antonio Sánchez-Nicolás
Principal Investigator
Aula Dental Avanzada
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients who present to one of the two participating clinics with a posterior edentulous area starting from the second premolar.
- •Patients in whom the placement of dental implants is not contraindicated.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with hypersensitivities or allergies that contraindicate the intervention.
- •Presence of orofacial neurological symptoms.
- •Patients treated with bisphosphonates.
- •Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women undergoing contraceptive treatment.
- •Signs of infection in the surgical area.
- •Need for unconventional surgical procedures (e.g., split crest, vertical regeneration, block graft).
- •Lack of patient cooperation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by intraoral scan and planning software)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of surgery
Three-dimensional deviations between the planned implant position and the actual postoperative implant position will be assessed. The deviations will be measured using an intraoral scanner (Medit i700®) and planning software (BlueSky Plan®). Units of measure: horizontal and vertical linear deviation (in millimeters), global deviation (in millimeters), and angular deviation (in degrees), evaluated at both implant entry and apex points.
Secondary Outcomes
- Three-dimensional implant position deviations (measured by CBCT and planning software)(From enrollment to the end of surgery)