Volumetric Imaging Follow up of Patients With Liver Metastases of Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs).
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?
研究概览
简要总结
More than 50% of intestinal NETs are metastatic at the time of diagnosis, the liver being the main affected organ in 50-90% of cases.
Initial liver tumor burden and slope of the tumor growth rate are two major prognostic factors in patients with intestinal NETs, followed by tumor grade at pathology. They are used in routine practice by oncologists to adapt patient treatment.
Unlike other tumors, most NETs metastases are slow-growing tumors. Previous studies have shown that approximately half of the patients diagnosed with liver metastases showed no progression over a period of 3 to 6 months.
The aim of this non randomised retrospective cohort study is to investigate whether the volumetric monitoring of the total tumor burden compared to the RECIST 1.1 criteria (used in routine practice by radiologists) at baseline and early follow-up (3 to 6 months) is more suitable for NETs, making possible to predict the prognosis at the onset of the disease, and also allowing a better adaptation of the treatment.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate if the initial volume of the liver tumor is a prognostic factor of time to progression, to correlate the initial liver tumor volume and the number of liver lesions to the blood concentration of Chromogranin A (CgA), the presence of extra-abdominal disease and to correlate the tumor growth rate (TGR) and KI 67 (%) at base-line.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Well differentiated intestinal neuroendocrine tumor with at least one liver metastasis
- •The liver metastasis must be visible and measurable on CT scans or MRI
- •Patients monitored without invasive liver treatment : surgery, RF ablation / Trans-arterial chemoembolization
- •Patients monitored without systemic treatment such as: Chemotherapy, Everolimus, Sunitinib (Somatostatin analogues allowed)
- •Surgery of the primary tumor allowed
排除标准
- •Other type of NETs
- •Absence of liver metastases
- •Liver metastases not visible on CT scans/MRI, poorly limited lesions and small target lesions ( less than 10mm) that are difficult to measure
- •Lesions visible only on diffusion-weighted imaging -MRI acquisitions, thus presenting poorly limited contours
- •Invasive liver treatment : surgery, Radio frequency / Trans-arterial chemoembolization
- •Systemic treatments: Chemotherapy / Everolimus / Sunitinib
- •Insufficient follow-up data
结局指标
主要结局
Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?
时间窗: 6 months
To assess if the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume compared to a follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months is predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria
次要结局
- Could the evolution of the initial liver tumor volume (on two follow-up CT scans / MRI over a period of 3 to 6 months) be predictive of progression-free survival according to the RECIST criteria?(6 months)