A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial assessing the impact of lipoprotein(a) lowering with pelacarsen (TQJ230) on the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis [Lp(a)FRONTIERS CAVS]
- Conditions
- Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Registration Number
- 2022-502135-19-00
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharma AG
- Brief Summary
To demonstrate the superiority of pelacarsen (TQJ230) versus placebo in slowing the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis by evaluating the change from baseline to month 36 in peak aortic jet velocity by echocardiography and,
To demonstrate the superiority of pelacarsen (TQJ230) vs. placebo in slowing the progression of calcific aortic valve stenosis by evaluating the change from baseline to month 36 in aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 264
Male and female ≥50 to <80 years of age
Lipoprotein(a) ≥175 nmol/L at Screening-Part I, measured at the central laboratory
Mild or moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis as defined by a peak aortic jet velocity ≥2.5 m/s and ≤3.5 m/s at Screening-Part II, as assessed by the core laboratory
At the randomization visit, participant must be optimally treated for existing CV risk factors (e.g. LDL-C, Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension according to local practice/guidelines)
Severe calcific aortic valve stenosis defined by mean gradient >40 mmHg or aortic valve area <1 cm2 at Screening-Part II, as assessed by the core laboratory
History of hemorrhagic stroke or other major bleeding
Platelet count <140,000 per mm3
Active liver disease or hepatic dysfunction
Significant kidney disease
Pregnant or nursing women
Planned aortic valve intervention
Unicuspid valve or other congenital cardiac anomaly (bicuspid aortic valve morphology is not excluded), at Screening-Part II, as assessed by the core laboratory
Severe mitral valve stenosis (valve area <1.5 cm2), severe mitral valve regurgitation, or severe aortic valve regurgitation at Screening-Part II, as assessed by the core laboratory
Inability to undergo or to acquire an optimal echocardiogram or computed tomography, or contraindication to computed tomography contrast media
Left ventricular ejection fraction <55% at Screening-Part II, as assessed by the core laboratory
Heart failure New York Heart Association class III - IV at Screening-Part II or at Randomization visit (Day 1)
Uncontrolled hypertension
History of malignancy of any organ system
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in peak aortic jet velocity from baseline to month 36 Change in peak aortic jet velocity from baseline to month 36
Change in aortic valve calcium score from baseline to month 36 Change in aortic valve calcium score from baseline to month 36
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in lipoprotein(a) levels from baseline to month 12 Change in lipoprotein(a) levels from baseline to month 12
Change in fibrocalcific thickening of the aortic valve from baseline to month 36 Change in fibrocalcific thickening of the aortic valve from baseline to month 36
Time from randomization to first occurrence of composite clinical endpoint event, defined as reaching either: • Unplanned CAVS related hospital admission • Aortic valve intervention • Death related to calcific aortic valve stenosis Time from randomization to first occurrence of composite clinical endpoint event, defined as reaching either: • Unplanned CAVS related hospital admission • Aortic valve intervention • Death related to calcific aortic valve stenosis
Safety endpoints (including adverse events/serious adverse events, safety laboratory parameters, vital signs) collected from baseline to end of study Safety endpoints (including adverse events/serious adverse events, safety laboratory parameters, vital signs) collected from baseline to end of study
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (32)
Heart Center Research Llc
🇺🇸Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Cardiovascular Res Found
🇺🇸Beverly Hills, California, United States
National Heart Institute
🇺🇸Beverly Hills, California, United States
Foothill Cardiology
🇺🇸Covina, California, United States
Valley Clinical Trials
🇺🇸Northridge, California, United States
University Of California San Diego
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
UC San Francisco Medical Center
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States
Stanford University Medical Center
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
Excel Medical Clinical Trials LLC
🇺🇸Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Inpatient Research Clinical LLC
🇺🇸Miami Lakes, Florida, United States
Scroll for more (22 remaining)Heart Center Research Llc🇺🇸Huntsville, Alabama, United StatesAnneke MillerContact+1 256 519 8255amiller4@theheartcenter.mdVernon R HunterPrincipal Investigator