SLCTR/2014/025招募中未知
Induction of multiparous women at term using different methods: Prostaglandin E2 (dinopristone) vaginal gel, intracervical foley catheter insertion and sweeping of membrane: An open-label, randomised controlled trial.
ew unit for Obstetrics and Gynaecology0 个研究点开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1. Multiparous women undergoing induction of labour at the study setting.
- •2. Gestation more than 40+4 weeks
- •3. Singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation
- •4. Unruptured membrane
- •5. Modified Bishop Score (MBS) less than 8
排除标准
- •1. Primiparity
- •2. Malpresentation and unstable lie.
- •3. Favourable cervix (MBS of 8 or above)
- •4. Any contraindication to vaginal birth, with previous uterine surgery (including caesarean section, placenta previa and other placental anomalies)
- •5. Age less than 18 years
- •6. Lethal fetal congenital anomaly
- •7. Known allergy to any of the interventional products
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
A study to find out whether repeat caeserean section is better than planned vaginal delivery for the baby and mother in women who has undergone Caesarean section earlier.CTRI/2020/06/026114JIPMER Puducherry
已完成
不适用
Foley Catheter Compared to the Foley Catheter Alone for Cervical RipeningCervical RipeningInduction of LaborNCT03111316University of Oklahoma100
终止
3 期
A Trial of Cervidil for Outpatient Pre-induction of Cervical RipeningInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornNCT03806231Intermountain Health Care, Inc.8
已完成
不适用
Caesarean Section Following Induction of Labour in Nulliparous Women with an Unfavourable Cervix: a Comparison of Three Ripening Agents - PGE2 Gel, Single or Double Balloon CatheterInduction of labour in nulliparous women with unfavourable cervixReproductive Health and Childbirth - Fetal medicine and complications of pregnancyACTRN12609000186257The University of Western Australia330
已完成
不适用
use of mifepristone for induction of labor in women with previous one low segment cesarean section comparison with mechanical stretching of cervixCTRI/2012/06/002733DR RAJENDRA PRASAD GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE KANGRA AT TANDA107
