MedPath

Evaluation Of Anchorage Control During Canine Retraction Using Arch Wire Stopper Versus Mini-Screws

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Interventions
Device: archwire stopper mesial to the maxillary first molar group
Device: inter-radicular mini-screw
Registration Number
NCT06416904
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the anchorage control during canine retraction using arch wire stopper versus mini-screws in post-pubertal patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

Detailed Description

The study begins with patient selection according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by treatment planning, and then bonding of orthodontic brackets of the upper and lower arches, including the second maxillary molars.

After leveling and alignment for all participants, the extraction of the maxillary first premolars will be performed.

* In the "Intervention Group" Canine retraction will be performed on 0.017×0.025 ss archwire with an archwire stopper mesial to the upper first molar.

* In the "Comparator Group" Canine retraction on 0.017×0.025 ss archwire with the upper first molars indirectly anchored to inter-radicular mini screws

Lastly, the anchorage control in both groups and the secondary outcomes will be assessed using the obtained digital models and lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
26
Inclusion Criteria
  • Post-pubertal female patients.
  • Cases with bimaxillary protrusion or Class II Division 1 malocclusion that require maxillary first premolars extraction.
  • Full permanent dentition (not necessitating third molars).
  • Good oral hygiene.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Medically compromised patients.
  • Active periodontal disease or obvious bone loss in the maxillary arch.
  • Patients with habits that are detrimental to dental occlusion (thumb sucking, tongue thrusting).
  • Smoking or any systemic diseases.
  • Chronic use of any medications including antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. All the above factors affect the rate of tooth movement
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Missing teeth.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
arch wire stopper mesial to the maxillary first molar grouparchwire stopper mesial to the maxillary first molar groupIn postpubertal female patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, canine retraction after the extraction of the maxillary first premolars with archwire stoppers mesial to the maxillary first molars.
maxillary first molar indirectly anchored to the inter-radicular mini-screw groupinter-radicular mini-screwIn postpubertal female patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion, canine retraction after the extraction of the maxillary first premolars, with the maxillary first molars indirectly anchored to the inter-radicular mini-screw.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Amount of anchorage loss of the maxillary first molars6 months from the start of the canine retraction

After full canine retraction, the amount of anchorage loss (mesial movement) of the maxillary first molars of will be assessed on the digital models

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Tipping of the maxillary first molar.6 months from the start of the canine retraction

the degree of tipping of the maxillary first molars will be assessed on the lateral cephalometric radiograph

Maxillary incisors inclination6 months from the start of the canine retraction

The change in the maxillary incisors inclination will be assessed on the lateral cephalometric radiograph

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath