MedPath

Pulmonary and Ventilatory Effects of Trigger Modulation in Intubated ICU

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
ICU Patients
Pulmonary Function
Intubation
Spontaneously Breathing
Tracheotomy
Registration Number
NCT04041817
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Brief Summary

Pressure support ventilation allows intubated ICU patients to breathe spontaneously. Among specific settings, the adjustment of the trigger value (or threshold for triggering the ventilator) has not been explored to date. The trigger threshold corresponds to the sensitivity of the ventilator to detect patient's inspiratory effort and then deliver the predefined pressure support to inflate the lungs and deliver a tidal volume. The purpose of this study is to explore the influence of trigger level on pulmonary and ventilatory physio (-patho)logical parameters in spontaneously breathing ICU patients.

Detailed Description

The use of invasive mechanical ventilation is one of the most frequent therapies in intensive care units (ICUs). There are several types of indications, depending on the failure: essentially neurological, hemodynamic or respiratory.

In recent years, the notion of lung damage induced by mechanical ventilation (VILI) has led to major changes in ventilator settings in both ICUs and operative rooms (Ors). The reduction of the tidal volume (TV) to 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight, the use of an individualized positive end-of-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the possible use of pulmonary aeration optimization therapies (alveolar recruitment manoeuvres, prone positioning sessions...) have become essential to increase patient's survival.

Withdrawal of invasive mechanical ventilation remains a daily issue and traditionally requires the transition from fully controlled ventilation to pressure support ventilation. Among specific settings of the latter, the adjustment of the trigger value (or threshold for triggering the ventilator) has not been explored to date. The trigger threshold corresponds to the sensitivity of the ventilator to detect patient's inspiratory effort and then deliver the predefined pressure support to inflate the lungs and deliver a tidal volume. The lower (or more sensitive) the trigger threshold, the smallest patient's effort will be rewarded. On the other hand, the higher the threshold, the greater the inspiratory effort required from the patient. Usually, this value is set by default to the minimum level to avoid self-triggering of the ventilator. With the objective to optimize pulmonary aeration, the use of higher trigger levels could increase diaphragmatic work (with a potential re-training and reinforcement effect) and contribute to better alveolar recruitment in the postero-inferior territories that are traditionally the most impacted, following a higher diaphragmatic motion. The authors propose to explore the impact of different trigger levels on pulmonary aeration (evaluated by electrical impedance tomography) and ventilatory parameters, in order to validate our hypotheses and before considering a trial with the objective of defining individualized trigger levels, according to patient's respiratory mechanics and pulmonary parenchyma morphology, with potential benefits on ventilator weaning.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patient hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of Clermont-Ferrand's Hospital
  • Patients with mechanical invasive ventilation in spontaneous ventilation with inspiratory support (intubation or tracheostomy)
  • Trigger level set to minimum
  • Patient under sedation compatible with spontaneous ventilation (SV) with inspiratory support (AI) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEP) Patient calm (RASS between -2 and 0) Consent for participation or consent from patient's next of kin or inclusion according to an emergency procedure Patient benefiting from the French social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refusal to participate in the proposed study

  • Contraindication to the installation of a nasogastric tube:

    • Severe disorder of uncorrected blood clotting
    • Known nasosinus lesion
    • Oesophageal varices recently ligated (<48h)
  • Contraindication to the use of the electro-impedancemetry technique by tomography

    • Thoracic lesions
    • Chest dressings
    • Pace-maker / Implantable Defibrillator
  • Known lesion of central respiratory centers, including patients with neurological injury

  • Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (according to Berlin criteria)

  • Patients with restrictive or obstructive pulmonary pathology

  • Patients admitted post-operatively for surgery that may affect the diaphragmatic function ( thoracic or abdominal supra-mesocolic)

  • Patients with abdominal distention (ileus, intra-abdominal hyperpressure)

  • Patient whose BMI is greater than 35 kg.m-2

  • Pregnant patient

  • Patient under guardianship,

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lung volume (end expiratory lung volume, EELV) at each trigger levelT150 minutes (last minute of the trigger step n°10)

The main endpoint is the difference between the lung volume (EELV) measured by electroimpedancemetry by tomography (EIT) at the end of each trigger level (15th minute) and the basal value measured at the beginning of the protocol

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Homogeneity of pulmonary aerationThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of homogeneity of pulmonary aeration with Global Inhomogeneity index by EIT

Regional impedance variationThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of regional impedance variation (TIV: Tidal Impedance Variation) by EIT

AtelectraumaThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Assessement of atelectrauma (RVD: Regional Ventilation Delay) by EIT

Lung volume variationsThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of lung volume variations by EIT (EELI : End Expiratory Lung Impedance)

Transpulmonary pressureThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of maximum transpulmonary pressure (alveolar stress)

Alveolar strain defined as the ratio between tidal volume and Functional Residual CapacityThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Alveolar strain defined as the ratio between tidal volume and Functional Residual Capacity

Transpulmonary driving pressureThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of transpulmonary driving pressure

Work of breathingThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of inspiratory occlusion pressure values (P01)

Energy deliveredMeasurement during the last minute of each trigger step

Evaluation of energy delivered to lungs patient

Diaphragm thickeningThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of the diaphragmatic thickening by ultrasound

Diaphragm motionThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Evaluation of the diaphragmatic motion by ultrasound

Patient's weightThrough study completion, 150 minutes

Study of the impact of patient's weight

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Service de Réanimation Adultes et Soins Continus

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Service de Réanimation Adultes et Soins Continus
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.