Static vs. Articulating Antibiotic Spacer for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee
- Registration Number
- NCT02547129
- Lead Sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Brief Summary
The primary aim of the study is to compare two techniques for treatment of total knee infection: resection total knee arthroplasty with an articulating (motion in the joint) spacer and resection total knee arthroplasty with a static (no motion in the joint) spacer.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 4
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Subjects With Repeat Infections 1 year post-operatively The rate of repeat infections after re-implantation Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Change in Total Knee Replacement Functional Scores baseline, 1 year post-operatively Functional scores were measured using the Knee Society Score, a clinical standard for rating the outcome of total knee replacements. Scores range from 0 -100, where a higher score reflects a more positive outcome for the subject.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pre-operative Range of Motion (ROM) baseline The degree of knee flexion was measured pre-operatively.
Post-operative Range of Motion (ROM) 1 year post-operatively The degree of knee flexion was measured one year post-operatively.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States