MedPath

Static vs. Articulating Antibiotic Spacer for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee
Registration Number
NCT02547129
Lead Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Brief Summary

The primary aim of the study is to compare two techniques for treatment of total knee infection: resection total knee arthroplasty with an articulating (motion in the joint) spacer and resection total knee arthroplasty with a static (no motion in the joint) spacer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
4
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Subjects With Repeat Infections1 year post-operatively

The rate of repeat infections after re-implantation Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Change in Total Knee Replacement Functional Scoresbaseline, 1 year post-operatively

Functional scores were measured using the Knee Society Score, a clinical standard for rating the outcome of total knee replacements. Scores range from 0 -100, where a higher score reflects a more positive outcome for the subject.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pre-operative Range of Motion (ROM)baseline

The degree of knee flexion was measured pre-operatively.

Post-operative Range of Motion (ROM)1 year post-operatively

The degree of knee flexion was measured one year post-operatively.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

🇺🇸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Mayo Clinic in Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.