Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin Versus Simvastatin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Dyslipidemia
- Conditions
- Diabetes MellitusDyslipidemia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00506961
- Lead Sponsor
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- Brief Summary
This is a phase IV, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, comparative and forced- titration study to compare the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus simvastatin in patients with type 2 DM and dyslipidemia. When comparing the efficacy of rosuvastatin 20 mg with simvastatin 40 mg for the treatment of type 2 DM with dyslipidemia, rosuvastatin 20 mg is superior to simvastatin 40 mg in achieving the combined goal of LDL-C (\<100 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (\<130 mg/dL).
- Detailed Description
The duration of patient participation will be 18 weeks consisting of a 1-week screening period, a 5-week lead-in period, followed by a 12-week treatment period.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Male and female between the ages of 20-75 years.
- Female patients post menopausal, hysterectomized or if of childbearing potential using a reliable method of birth control.
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Fasting triglyceride ≧150 mg/dL ≦500 mg/dL or Non-HDL-C≧130,but≦200 mg/dL
- Patients receiving stable antidiabetic treatment for 8 weeks before randomization (no change in the category of anti-diabetic agents, but the dose is adjustable).
- All patients give written informed consent.
- A history of hypersensitivity to statins.
- A history of rhabdomyolysis or hereditary muscle disorders.
- Insulin-treated patients.
- Patient with any conditions of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
- Creatine kinase ≧3-fold upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Patients with an estimated creatinine clearance (see note)≦30 ml/min or bilirubin ≧1.5-fold ULN, or chronic active hepatitis or liver function impairment (AST and ALT ≧3-fold ULN).
- Overt proteinuria (repeat spot urine protein >300mg/dl by dipstick method).
- Patients are taking cyclosporine.
- A history of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or familial dysbetalipoproteinemia.
- Patients with alcohol and drug abuse in past 3 years.
- Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions.
- Hypothyroidism (TSH > 5 μIU/mL).
- In the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the patient's well-being or might confound the clinical trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 Simvastatin 20 mg simvastatin for 4 weeks followed by 40 mg simvastatin for another 8 weeks 1 Rosuvastatin 10 mg rosuvastatin for 4 weeks followed by 20 m rosuvastatin for another 8 weeks
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The percentage of patients achieving the combined treatment goal of LDL-C < 100mg/dl and non-HDL-C < 130 mg/dl at week 12 with rosuvastatin treatment compared with simvastatin treatment 12 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Achieving the combined treatment goal of LDL-C (<100 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (130 mg/dL) at week 4; 4 weeks Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL at week 4 and week 12; 12 weeks Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL at Week;The mean percent change from baseline in lipid profile at week 4 and week 12; 12 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳Taichung, Taiwan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Taiwan