The effect of virtual reality camera-based mirror therapy on upper extremity motor function in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- hemiplegic cerebral palsy.Spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsyG80.2
- Registration Number
- IRCT20211024052860N1
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
Age range 8 to 12 years
Hemiplegic cerebral palsy, diagnosed by a neurologist
Being at levels I, II and III of the MACS (manual ability classification system)
Ability to study at school
Mild spasticity involved in wrist flexor (modified Ashworth scale less than 2)
Exclusion Criteria
Unwillingness to participate in the study (not completing the consent form)
Use mirror therapy approaches before the intervention
Injection of Botox or surgery on the upper limb for up to 1 year before the intervention
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What neuroplasticity mechanisms underlie camera-based mirror therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy (G80.2)?
How does virtual reality mirror therapy compare to conventional CIMT for upper extremity motor recovery in spastic hemiplegic CP?
Are there neuroimaging biomarkers predicting response to VR-based mirror therapy in 8-12 year-old hemiplegic CP patients?
What adverse events are associated with immersive virtual reality interventions in pediatric cerebral palsy populations?
How does IRCT20211024052860N1's approach integrate with pharmacological treatments for spasticity in G80.2 cerebral palsy?