To compare aerosol generation with Proseal Laryngeal mask airway and Endotracheal tube in adult patients
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/05/042487
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
adults of ASA 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
1.mouth opening <2.5cm
2.cervical spine fracture
3.gross anatomic abnormalities of head and neck or malformations of airway
4.radiation induced scarring or post burn contracture of perioral region or neck airway
5. edentulous patients
6.pregnant female
7. full stomach patient, hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflus
8. difficult laryngoscopy amd intubation
9. bony abnormalities of cervicalspine or TM joint
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluating and comparing quantitative assessment of aerosol generation in <br/ ><br>terms of number (ug/cumm) and concentration per litre using Proseal laryngeal mask airway <br/ ><br>and endotracheal tubeTimepoint: 1. Baseline <br/ ><br>2. After endotracheal tube or proseal laryngeal mask insertion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Time taken for aerosol particle after intubation using Proseal laryngeal mask airway or <br/ ><br>endotracheal tube to return to the baseline value and will be noted in minutes. <br/ ><br>2. Time taken to decrease aerosol particle after extubation using Proseal laryngeal mask <br/ ><br>airway or endotracheal tube to return to the baseline value and will be noted in minutes.Timepoint: After extubation, serial recordings will be taken till the aerosol concentration comes to baseline and that time will be noted