CTRI/2021/07/035077已完成未知
Concurrent use of Foleys catheter along with vaginal misoprostol versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour - A comparative study
none0 个研究点目标入组 200 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 200
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1. Pregnant women with Single live pregnancy of more than equal to 37 weeks
- •2. Valid indication for induction
- •3. Cephalic presentation
- •4. Bishops score <=4
- •5. No foetal compromise
- •6. No contraindications for vaginal delivery
排除标准
- •1. Cephalo pelvic disproportion on examination
- •2. History of antepartum haemorrhage or placenta praevia on ultrasound
- •3. History of previous caesarean or other uterine surgery
- •4. Premature rupture of membranes or Chorioamnionitis
- •5. Contraindications to the use of prostaglandins
研究者
相似试验
终止
不适用
Membrane sweeping or no membrane sweeping just prior to transcervical Foley catheter insertion for induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean deliveryISRCTN87387293niversity Malaya Medical Centre63
已完成
4 期
Intra vaginal misoprostol versus Foley cathether for induction of labour in foetus with suspected foetal compromiseCTRI/2014/02/004411Christian Medical College and Hospital100
进行中（未招募）
不适用
comparison of two different methods (Foley cetheter or oral misoprostol) for labour inductioInduction of labour at termMedDRA version: 16.0Level: LLTClassification code 10023540Term: Labor inducedSystem Organ Class: 100000004868EUCTR2011-000026-30-NLAcademic medical centre1,860
尚未招募
Unknown
Evaluation of the usefulness of a catheter flushing method to improve the diagnosis rate of brushing cytology in biliary stricture: a prospective multicenter comparative studyKCT0009179Bundang CHA General Hospital185
已完成
不适用
Fluoroscopic guided-catheter insertion method for continuous femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, one institutional, interventional studyOsteoarthritis of the kneeJPRN-UMIN000026776Matsuda Hospital25