跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02761317
NCT02761317Unknown4 期

Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen for Patients With With a History of Colorectal Resection Before Colonoscopy

Shandong University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2016年5月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
发起方
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
Difference of scores rating by Aronchick Preparation Scale among 3 groups.

研究概览

简要总结

The study compares the efficacy of bowel cleansing between the standard preparation (2 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution, 2 L PEG-ELS), low-volume preparation (10 mg bisacodyl plus 2 L PEG-ELS) and high-volume preparation (4 L PEG-ELS) in patients with previous colorectal resection.

详细描述

Colonoscopy is the standard approach for evaluating the colon currently. Thorough bowel cleansing is critical for adequate visualization of colonic mucosa during colonoscopy. Inadequate bowel cleansing results in adverse consequences for the examination, including lower adenoma detection rates, longer procedural time, lower cecal intubation rates, shorter intervals between examinations and an estimated 12-22% increase in overall colonoscopy cost. A history of colorectal resection represents an independent predictor for inadequate colon cleansing,hence strategies to improve bowel preparation may be a demanding goal in this subset of patients.

The study compares the efficacy of bowel cleansing between the standard preparation (2 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution, 2 L PEG-ELS), low-volume preparation (10 mg bisacodyl plus 2 L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution) and high-volume preparation (4L polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution, 4L PEG-ELS) in patients with previous colorectal resection. Then the investigators can select the optimized regimen for patients with colorectal surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All adults (18< age<75years) referred for surveillance colonoscopy with a history of colorectal resection for Colorectal cancer (CRC).

排除标准

  • severe comorbidities (e.g. congestive heart failure and severe kidney disease)
  • abdominal and pelvic surgery other than colorectal resection for the cause of CRC.
  • severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumour
  • dysphagia
  • compromised swallowing reflex or mental status
  • significant gastroparesis or gastric outlet obstruction
  • known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
  • severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance<30 ml/min
  • severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV)
  • uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure>100 mm Hg)
  • inflammatory bowel disease or megacolon
  • dehydration
  • disturbance of electrolytes
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • haemodynamically unstable
  • unable to give informed consent.

研究组 & 干预措施

GroupA:standard preparation

Active Comparator

Subjects who are randomized into group A receive standard bowel preparation (2L PEG-ELS) on the same-day of procedure.

干预措施: standard preparation (2L PEG-ELS) (Drug)

Group B:low-volume preparation

Experimental

Subjects who are randomized into group B receive 10mg bisacodyl at 6 pm on the evening before the colonoscopy and 2L PEG-ELS on the same-day of procedure. ( 2L PEG-ELS and 10mg bisacodyl )

干预措施: low-volume preparation (10 mg bisacodyl plus 2L PEG-ELS) (Drug)

Group C:high-volume preparation

Experimental

Subjects who are randomized into group C will receive 2L PEG-ELS at 6 pm before the procedure and another 2L PEG-ELS on the same-day of procedure. (4 L PEG-ELS)

干预措施: high-volume preparation (4L PEG-ELS) (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Difference of scores rating by Aronchick Preparation Scale among 3 groups.

时间窗: 6 months

This is an established rating scale to evaluate the quality of bowel prep. The ratings will be compared among the 3 groups.

次要结局

  • Rate of compliance with instructions among 3 groups(6 months)
  • Withdrawal time among 3 groups.(6 months)
  • Caecal intubation rate among 3 groups.(6 months)
  • Willingness to repeat bowel preparation among 3 groups.(6 months)
  • Polyp detection rate among 3 groups.(6 months)

研究者

发起方
Shandong University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yanqing Li

PhD, MD

Shandong University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Optimal Bowel Preparation Regimen in Patients With... | 临床试验