RANDOMISED CONTROL STUDY TO FIND THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS LARYNGOSCOPIES IN TERMS OF INTUBATION RESPONSE
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- adult patients coming for general surgical procedures under general anesthesia of ASA I physical status
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2015/08/006131
- Lead Sponsor
- nil
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 90
Inclusion Criteria
ASA I patients posted for surgical procedures under general anesthesia of age 18-40 years
Exclusion Criteria
•ASA II and above
•Pregnancy
•Emergency surgery
•Airway abnormalities and anticipated difficult airway
•Laryngoscopy lasting for >30 seconds.
•More than one attempt at intubation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study and compare the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with different laryngoscopes such as the Macintosh, McCoy and C MAC video laryngoscope in adult patients posted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and oral endotracheal intubation.Timepoint: 10minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method nilTimepoint: nil