Increasing implant stability using bonedensification technique.

Not yet recruiting

Conditions: Encounter for fitting and adjustment of dental prosthetic device,

Brief Summary: The key vital role for the long term success of implant mainly depends on osseointegration. Osseointegrated implants have better bone quality and stability. The concept of osseointegration was introduced by BRANEMARK & Colleagues in the year 1969. This osseointegration was based on the primary stability, which was achieved immediately after the implant placement. To obtain biomechanically stable implants, high bone density and bone quality are the ideal requisites, indirectly resulting in better secondary stability. SALAH HUWAIS, in the year 2013, introduced a novel technique that helps in the densification of bone by autografting the individualâ€™s bone within the osteotomy site wall. This in due results in creating a suitable environment for osteoblast nucleation on the autografted bone, which is close to the integrated implant body. Thus, new bone growth formation enhances within the osteotomy site. This physical and biomechanical interlocking results in higher primary stability values, which is mainly attributed to condensation and preservation of the bone by lateral compaction. This OSSEODENSIFICATION procedure has come under the limelight in recent times as it increases both the implantsâ€™ mechanical stability and peri-implant bone density.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Adequate oral hygiene 2)Patients between 20 to 65 years 3)Patients with missing teeth in the posterior region.

Exclusion Criteria

1)Medically compromised subjects.
(uncontrolled diabetics) 2)General contraindications against implant treatment (radiotherapy, immunodeficiency, etc.).
3)Untreated, periodontal disease, or caries.
4)Pregnancy.
5)Heavy smoker (>10 cigarettes per day).
6)Poor oral hygiene.
7)Parafunctional habits.
8)Alcohol or drug abuse.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Primary stability is measured immediately after implant placement.	Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
2.Primary and early secondary stability are measured at 6 weeks interval (healing abutment will be placed to avoid injury at the implant site).	3.Secondary implant stability is measured at the 12th week (before the abutment placement)

Locations (1): ANIL NEERUKONDA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES
🇮🇳
Visakhapatnam, ANDHRA PRADESH, India
ANIL NEERUKONDA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES
🇮🇳Visakhapatnam, ANDHRA PRADESH, India
CHITITHOTI RISHITHA
Principal investigator
8897134572
chrishitha1@gmail.com