Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01317589
NCT01317589
Completed
Phase 4

Treatment of Pain in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: is Methadone More Effective Than Fentanyl?

Maastricht University Medical Center1 site in 1 country134 target enrollmentMay 2011

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
fentanyl
Conditions
Pain
Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Enrollment
134
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
significant pain relief (reduction of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 50%)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Background of the study:

Treatment of Pain in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients:

is methadone more effective than fentanyl?

Pain is a prevalent symptom in patients with cancer. A neuropathic component is seen in one third of the patients. In patients with head-and-neck cancer neuropathic pain is far more prevalent than in a general cancer population: 46-64%. Treatment of neuropathic pain is complex and available treatment modalities achieve (partial) pain relief in only 40-60% of patients. The N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) plays a central role in the mediation of neuropathic pain. NMDAR blockers could be a new approach to treat neuropathic pain in patients with cancer.

Methadone is a strong opioid but at the same time significant non-competitive NMDA-receptor antagonist qualities have been described. Many small studies and case-reports describe the successful rotation from different strong opioids to methadone. There are no studies that selected patients with (predominantly) neuropathic pain to be treated with methadone, whereas this group of patients is expected to profit from the NMDAR-antagonist properties of methadone.

Objective of the study:

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to investigate whether addition of a NMDAR-antagonist to a strong opioid (methadone) is superior in the treatment of predominantly neuropathic pain over a strong opioid alone (fentanyl) in terms of pain relief and time to achieve significant pain relief.

Study design:

Open label randomised controlled trial

Study population:

opioid naïve patients with histological proven head-and-neck cancer and (partly) neuropathic pain with a NRS score of ≥ 4, age =/> 18 years

Intervention Treatment with methadone or fentanyl patch

Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:

Is methadone more effective than fentanyl in the treatment of pain in patients with head-and-neck cancer with respect to

  1. significant pain relief (reduction of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 50%) and
  2. pain interference

Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:

Is methadone superior to fentanyl in the treatment of pain in patients with head-and-neck cancer with respect to

  1. time to achieve significant pain relief
  2. side-effect profile?

Detailed Description

Study design The duration of the study will be 9 weeks. Patients will visit the outpatient clinic 5 times. Patients of MAASTRO clinic will be seen directly before or after the radiation therapy. No extra visits will be necessary. T= -1: - informed consent * sort of pain (DN4) * randomisation T = 0 - questionnaire 1: demographic variables, disease specific variables, BPI, side effect questions, HADS, QoL * explain and provide the pain sheet * start methadone 2 x 2,5 mg or fentanyl patch 12 μg/uur * breakthrough medication: 50 µg fentanyl nose spray or fentanyl stick 400 µg till 6x/day T=1 - questionnaire 2: BPI, side effect questions, global perceived effect 1 week - review pain sheet on pain and total rescue doses * if necessary increase dose strong opioid with 50% T=2 - questionnaire 2: BPI, side effect questions, global perceived effect 3 weeks - review pain sheet on pain and total rescue doses * if necessary increase dose strong opioid with 50% * if necessary decrease dose strong opioid with 30% T=3 - questionnaire 2: BPI, side effect questions, global perceived effect 5 weeks - review pain sheet on pain and total rescue doses * if necessary increase dose strong opioid with 50% * if necessary decrease dose strong opioid with 30% T = 4 - questionnaire 3: BPI, side effect questions, global perceived effect, QoL * if necessary increase dose strong opioid with 50% * if necessary decrease dose strong opioid with 30%

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2011
End Date
July 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • opioid naive patients with histological proven head-and-neck cancer and (partly) neuropathic pain with a NRS score of =/\> 4

Exclusion Criteria

  • age under 18
  • not being able to read or fill in the questionnaires
  • recent operation (less than 7 days)
  • women of childbearing potential not using contraception

Arms & Interventions

fentanyl

active pain treatment with fentanyl patch

Intervention: fentanyl

methadone

active pain treatment with methadone

Intervention: methadone

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

significant pain relief (reduction of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 50%)

Time Frame: 9 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • side-effect profile(9 weeks)
  • time to achieve significant pain relief(9 weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials