NCT06499818
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus CPVI Plus Low-Voltage Areas Ablation During SR Versus CPVI Plus Low-Voltage Areas Ablation During AF for the Treatment of CAF
ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Sponsor
- Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
- Enrollment
- 150
- Primary Endpoint
- The incidence of no atrial arrhythmias greater than 30 seconds
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of Three different AF ablation strategies in patients with Persistent atrial fibrillation: CPVI plus Low-Voltage Areas ablation during sinus rhythm Versus. CPVI Plus Low-Voltage Areas Ablation During AF and CPVI alone.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients age is 18-80 years;
- •Patients with non-paroxysmal AF; non-paroxysmal AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting \> 7 days;
- •Patients can sign the written informed consent for the study;
- •Patients can endure the required follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients who had previously undergone atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, or atypical atrial flutter ablation
- •Preoperative combined atrial tachycardia (≥30S) and atypical atrial flutter
- •Left atrial diameter \>55mm
- •Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
- •Left atrial thrombus
- •Postoperative cardiac surgery
- •After valve replacement
- •After permanent pacemaker implantation
- •hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- •Patients with moderate-to-severe aortic valve disease, moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, and severe other valvular disease
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The incidence of no atrial arrhythmias greater than 30 seconds
Time Frame: at least 18 months follow up
The incidence of no atrial arrhythmias greater than 30 seconds
Secondary Outcomes
- No use of antiarrhythmic drugs and no occurrence of atrial tachycardia/flutter exceeding 30 seconds(at least 18 months follow up)
- Atrial fibrillation load(at least 18 months follow up)
- No use of antiarrhythmic drugs and no occurrence of atrial fibrillation exceeding 30 seconds(at least 18 months follow up)
- Procedure time(Surgical procedure)
- Ablation time(1 week after patient enrollment)
- Incidence of peri-procedural complications(at least 18 months follow up)
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
CPVI Alone Versus. CPVI Plus Electrophysiological Substrate Ablation in the LA During SR for the Treatment of Non-PAFAtrial FibrillationNCT03448562The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University300
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Linear Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Randomized Controlled TrialAtrial FibrillationNCT02721121Yonsei University220
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Complex Pulmonary Vein Isolation Additional Linear Ablation for Recurred Atrial Fibrillation After Previous Catheter Ablation: Prospective Randomized Trial (RILI Trial)Recurred Atrial FibrillationNCT02747498Yonsei University120
Completed
Phase 3
First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (The RAAFT Study)Atrial FibrillationNCT00392054Population Health Research Institute127
Completed
Not Applicable
The Comparison Between the PVAM and CPVI for the Patients of PAFAtrial FibrillationPulmonary Vein IsolationNCT03026413The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University180