MedPath

Low-frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation To Enhance Motor Recovery In The Subacute Phase After Stroke

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Other: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Registration Number
NCT01333579
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Brief Summary

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the unaffected hemisphere (UH) transiently improves motor function in patients in the chronic phase after stroke. The goal of this study is to investigate effects on motor recovery of low-frequency rTMS of the UH, administered in the subacute phase after stroke.

Detailed Description

Stroke is a major cause of disability and worldwide. Hand motor impairment is frequent after stroke. Even mild impairments of the upper limb negatively impact disability and quality of life in these patients significantly contributes to disability. Therapeutic alternatives for hand motor rehabilitation are deeply needed.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a potential tool to improve hand motor performance after stroke. While high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) often increases motor cortical excitability, LF-rTMS often has the opposite effect. Up-regulation of excitability in the affected hemisphere by HF-rTMS or down-regulation of the UH by LF-rTMS can restore the balance in inter-hemispheric inhibition and hence, facilitate movement of the paretic hand Both strategies, as well as the combination of both, have yielded encouraging results when applied in proof-of-principle, single-session studies to patients with mild hand motor impairment in the subacute and chronic stages after stroke. However, few rTMS studies included patients less than six months after stroke, and effects of LF-rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in patients with severe motor impairment in the subacute phase have not been yet reported.

The investigators opted for a novel approach to enhance hand motor recovery, by examining feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of either active or sham LF-rTMS of the UH or sham rTMS as add-on therapies to outpatient customary rehabilitation, to patients with mild to severe hand paresis, within 5-45 days after unilateral ischemic stroke. The investigators hypothesize that, at this stage, LF-rTMS will be feasible even in patients with severe motor deficits, will have minimal adverse events and will enhance effects of customary rehabilitation on hand motor performance.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
34
Inclusion Criteria
  • First-ever ischemic stroke in the internal carotid artery territory confirmed by CT or MRI, 5-45 days before, leading to contralateral hand weakness
  • Age, 18-80 years
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Pregnancy
  • Implantable medication pump
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • History of seizures
  • Metal in the head
  • Decompressive surgery
  • Other neurological diseases
  • Shoulder pain
  • Joint deformity in the paretic upper limb
  • Severe chronic disease such as end-stage cancer or end-stage renal failure
  • Inability to provide informed consent due to severe language or cognitive impairment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Placebo rTMSRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation1Hz placebo rTMS delivered to the vertex
Active rTMSRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation1Hz active rTMS delivered to the unaffected hemisphere
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor function of the paretic hand evaluated with the Jebsen-Taylor testBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Number of patients able to comply with the protocolBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Measures of corticomotor excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulationBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Force of the paretic handBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Disability evaluated with the modified Rankin scaleBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Functional Independence MeasureBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Fugl-Meyer evaluation of motor performance (upper limb)Baseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment
Neurological impairment evaluated with the NIH Stroke ScaleBaseline, two weeks, 1 month, 3 and six months after end of treatment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Laboratório de Neuroestimulação, HC/FMUSP

🇧🇷

São Paulo, SP, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath