跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01205360
NCT01205360撤回不适用

A Randomized, Control Study to Evaluate Dosing Strategies for Automated Mandatory Intermittent Boluses Technique for Epidural Labour Analgesia

Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences University0 个研究点开始时间: 2010年8月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
发起方
主要终点
Total epidural bupivacaine dose

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine how manipulation of the programmed intermittent time interval and volume influences total drug use, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction during maintenance of labor analgesia.

详细描述

Research for the ideal technique of maintaining epidural analgesia after the initial-level block is ongoing. Continuous infusion techniques, use of more dilute solutions , PCEA , and different techniques of PCEA like background dosing, none, fixed infusion as background, variable infusion (computer-integrated), programmed intermittent boluses (PIEBs) and automated mandatory boluses, have been used. Automated systems designed to administer a small bolus dose of anaesthetic at programmable intervals may combine the advantages of both manual bolus and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) systems.

Wong et al compared a PIEB (6 ml of bolus every 30 minutes) with CEI with the assumption that small frequent boluses may avoid wide fluctuations in sensory levels, commonly seen with traditional manually administered intermittent boluses and at the same time reduce the total anesthetic dose as in CEI. Chua and Sia showed that Pain scores were lower and the time to first manual epidural rescue bolus was longer in parturients assigned to intermittent boluses compared to continuous epidural infusion of the same solution in the intermittent group. Fettes and colleagues found that patients required a lower total drug dose and fewer manual bolus injections when epidural labor analgesia was maintained with automated intermittent boluses of ropivacaine compared to a continuous infusion. Solutions injected into the epidural space tend to spread more evenly when injected as a bolus, as compared to a continuous infusion. Furthermore, studies of epidural opioid analgesia suggest that epidural bolus administration of lipid soluble opioids (e.g., fentanyl) results in segmental spinal opioid analgesia, whereas continuous opioid epidural infusion results in systemic opioid analgesia. The analgesic effects of both epidural fentanyl infusion and epidural fentanyl bolus were evaluated using a volunteer, double blind, cross-over designs study. Taken together, the results of these studies suggest that further studies of automated intermittent bolus injections are indicated, in particular, studies of the optimal bolus time interval and volume. At one end of the spectrum, a short interval/low volume protocol may mimic a continuous infusion. At the other end of the spectrum, a long interval/large volume may negate the inherent safety of a continuous infusion. The purpose of the proposed study is to determine how manipulation of the programmed intermittent time interval and volume influences total drug use, quality of analgesia, and patient satisfaction during maintenance of labor analgesia.

Current pump technology does not support programmed intermittent bolus administration. The investigators encouraged the manufacturer to develop these features indigenously and incorporate them in presently available infusion pumps.

Methods:

Study will be carried out in randomly selected sixty uncomplicated full term pregnant patients, in active labour.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Full term women in spontaneous labor.
  • Gestation greater than or equal to 37 weeks.
  • Primigravida.
  • Age group between 18 Years to 45 Years.
  • ASA grade I or II
  • Not having any complicated pregnancy
  • Not having any systemic disorders.

排除标准

  • Not willing for Epidural analgesia.
  • Unwilling to get enrolled in this study.
  • Systemic disorder like diabetes mellitus, hypertension and heart disease, spine deformity, blood coagulation disorder, bad obstetric history and foetal abnormity.
  • Multiple-pregnancy or abnormal presentation.
  • Complicated pregnancy like pregnancy induced hypertension, placenta previa, abruptio placenta.
  • Cervical dilatation less than 2 or greater than 5 at time of initiation of neuraxial analgesia.
  • Chronic analgesic medications
  • Systemic opioid labor analgesia prior to the initiation of neuraxial labor analgesia.

研究组 & 干预措施

Bupivacaine-Fentanyl (3-15)

Active Comparator

Three millilitres of mixture of bupivacaine (0.125%) with fentanyl (2 µg/ml) injected through epidural catheter every 15 minutes as automated boluses.

干预措施: Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Mixture (Drug)

Bupivacaine-Fentanyl (4-20)

Experimental

Four millilitres of mixture of bupivacaine (0.125%) with fentanyl (2 µg/ml) injected through epidural catheter every 20 minutes.

干预措施: Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Mixture (Drug)

Bupivacaine-Fentanyl (6-30)

Experimental

Six millilitres of mixture of bupivacaine (0.125%) with fentanyl (2 µg/ml) injected through epidural catheter every 30 minutes.

干预措施: Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Mixture (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Total epidural bupivacaine dose

时间窗: 48 hours

Labour analgesic drug administration will be stopped after delivery and the total dose of bupivacaine will be calculated.

次要结局

  • Demographics(10 Minutes)
  • Quality of analgesia (Cumulative analgesia scores )(Every Hour)
  • Level of analgesia (VAS score)(48 hours)
  • Maternal satisfaction(48 hours)
  • No.of doses omitted(48 hours)
  • No.of Additional top-ups required(48 hours)
  • Duration of labour(48 hours)
  • Maternal Safety(48 hours)
  • Foetal Safety(48 hours)

研究者

发起方
Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences University
申办方类型
Other

相似试验