Clinical Effects in Cervical Spinal Mobilization and Oscillation Mobilization in Neck Pain
- Conditions
- Neck PainManual Therapy
- Interventions
- Other: Spine MobilizationsOther: Vertebral Resonant Oscillation
- Registration Number
- NCT03149614
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effects of spinal mobilization versus vertebral resonant oscillation (POLD) in patients with bilateral mechanical neck pain on pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.
- Detailed Description
The clinical practice guidelines for manual therapy management the neck pain including the spine mobilization.
The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.
The spinal mobilizations has a posterior-anterior vertebral movement for spinous process, described by Maitland 2000.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- neck pain symptoms of mechanical nature
- age from 18 to 60 years
- bilateral symptoms
- symptoms for at least 3 month of duration
- whiplash injury
- previous spine surgery
- diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
- having undergone any physical therapy intervention in the previous 6 month
- pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Spine Mobilizations Spine Mobilizations Patients receive spinal mobilizations in grades II to III of central posterior-anterior from cervical and thoracic spine as described Maitland in 2000. Vertebral Resonant Oscillation (POLD method) Vertebral Resonant Oscillation The vertebral resonant oscillation using the POLD method is similar to spine mobilizations, but there are some differens; the oscillatory movement has a sinusoidal waveform, the frequency used between 1.2 and 2 Hz and the amplitude is similar to "neutral zone" to described by Panjabi 1992.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in pain intensity before and after the intervention Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session. A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of neck pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in disability before and after the intervention Baseline, one week after the last session, 1 months and 3 months after the last session. Neck Pain Disability Index (NDI)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain