跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05054829
NCT05054829招募中不适用

Establishment of Social Skills Training Group in Adults With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Effectiveness Analysis

National Taiwan University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 160 人开始时间: 2017年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
160
试验地点
1
主要终点
Outcome analysis

研究概览

简要总结

This project aims to examine the effectiveness of social skill training group in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age from 18 to 45 years
  • having relational problems
  • having motivation to participate
  • good chinese speaking
  • having a healthy cargiver join together
  • IQ > 70 (WAIS)
  • Autism Spectrum Quotient > 26

排除标准

  • ever had psychosis and neurological diseases
  • visual and hiring impairment

研究组 & 干预措施

PEERS

Experimental

干预措施: PEERS®: program for the education and enrichment of relational skills (Behavioral)

Controls

Other

干预措施: PEERS®: program for the education and enrichment of relational skills (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Outcome analysis

时间窗: after intervention 12 weeks

Background characteristics, co-existing psychiatric conditions and dropout rates for the two groups are compared using χ2 tests. Differences between two groups' baseline measures are analyzed using two-sided independent t tests. The comparison will adopt an intention-to-treat principle. The missing data are substituted with last observation carried forward. To analyze the reasons for the attrition, the dropouts will also be compared to the completers on their clinical variables. Then, repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) are used to calculate between- and within-group effects on all continuous variables. Treatment effect calculations (Cohen's d) will be calculated for each indicator. Differences between the interventions in CGI-I will be examined using a one-way ANOVA. Reported change in the follow-up survey was compared between the PEERS group and the controls using independent t tests.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验