Comparison of Tele-rehabilitation Versus In-clinic Rehabilitation for Upper Limb Motor Function Stroke Patients
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Tele-rehabilitationDiagnostic Test: In-clinic Rehabilitation
- Registration Number
- NCT05875818
- Lead Sponsor
- Superior University
- Brief Summary
To determine the effects of Tele-rehabilitation versus in-clinical rehabilitation for upper limb motor function and spasticity in chronic ischemic stroke patients.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
Inclusion Criteria
-
• Patients from both genders.
- Patients with chronic ischemic stroke i.e. 6 months or more.
- Patients with 45 years old and above.
- On modified Ashworth scale, patient with limb spasticity equal to 2 or less than 2.
- On Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), patients with good cognitive function minimum 24 or more.
Exclusion Criteria
-
• Patients with any recurrent stroke history.
- Cognitive deficit patients (on Folstein Mini Mental state Examination score of less than 24)
- Patient having other neurological diseases.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Tele-rehabilitation Tele-rehabilitation - In-clinic Rehabilitation In-clinic Rehabilitation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fugal Myer assessment scale (FMAS) 6 Months Fugal Myer assessment scale (FMAS) to check the pain and funcationality in stroke
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) 6 Months Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to check the pain and funcationality in stroke
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chaudary Muhammad Akram Teaching Hospital
🇵🇰Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan