跳至主要内容
临床试验/DRKS00031801
DRKS00031801已完成不适用

A comparison of the symptothermal cycle method using intravaginaltemperature measurement versus conventional temperature measurement - a retrospective cohort study

trackle GmbH0 个研究点目标入组 25 人开始时间: 2023年8月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
25

研究概览

简要总结

In conclusion, compared to the standardized manual analysis, an analysis of cycle data performed by women trained in the symptothermal method led to "bio-equivalent" results. However, slight non-significant differences were found in a minority of analyzed cycles and, thus, one can assume that this user-driven analysis might be somewhat less reliable. Noteworthy, the results confirm that the trackle algorithm leads to completely similar results as the standard manual analysis in evaluation of fertile days using the general principles of the symptothermal method. In other words, the trackle algorithm applies these complex rules correctly and reliably.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(—)
性别
Female

入选标准

  • Cycle length between 24 and 38 days before study kick-off

排除标准

  • current therapy with contraceptives or ovarian stimulation with clomiphene, letrozole or follicle stimulating hormone and the unwillingness to provide electronic informed consent

研究者

发起方
trackle GmbH

相似试验

A comparison of the symptothermal cycle method using... | 临床试验