NCT01441362CompletedNot Applicable
A Comparison of Two Methods for Intubation With Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube to Reduce Laryngeal Injuries
Seoul National University Hospital2 sites in 2 countries154 target enrollmentStarted: September 2011Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 154
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- postoperative hoarseness
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to devise the method to reduce laryngeal injuries during double-lumen tube intubation.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients undergoing thoracic surgery that require the placement of left-sided double-lumen tubes
Exclusion Criteria
- •Preoperative hoarseness or sore throat
- •History of upper airway diseases
- •Anticipated difficult airway
- •Operation time longer than 6 hours
Arms & Interventions
90 degrees rotation
Active Comparator
Double-lumen tube intubation with 90 degrees rotation
Intervention: 90 degrees rotation (Procedure)
180 degrees rotation
Experimental
Double-lumen tube intubation with 180 degrees rotation
Intervention: 180 degrees rotation (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
postoperative hoarseness
Time Frame: up to 3 days
Secondary Outcomes
- postoperative sore throat(up to 3 days)
Investigators
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Unknown
Not Applicable
Laryngoscope-assisted Lightwand Intubation and Cervical Spine MotionDifficult IntubationNCT02430415Seoul National University Hospital22
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing anesthesia with imperfect consciousness and regional block in direct examination of airwaydirect laryngoscopy.Failed or difficult intubationIRCT2014122112642N6Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Tehran University of Medical Sciences60
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Strategies of Oropharyngeal and Tracheal Suctioning in Mechanically Ventilated PatientsVentilator Acquired PneumoniaAspirationNCT01807884University Hospital, Bordeaux24
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.ImmobilizationNCT01032460University College Hospital Galway90
Completed
Not Applicable
Macintosh and D-Blade® in Simulated Difficult AirwayDifficult IntubationCervical Injury SpineNCT03403946Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital48