Comparisson of blood pressure measured from Noninvasive/Automated (NIBP} technique and Manual technique (Sphygmomanometer) with direct invasive blood pressure (Arterial Line) measurement technique in patient undergoing neurosurgery.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Neurosurgical patients come for Aneurysm and Arterio-venous malformation Surgery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2017/11/010641
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Mohit Katare
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Procedures requiring blood pressure manipulations under anaesthesia.
patients subjected to radial artery cannulation
Exclusion Criteria
1.Severely hemodynamic compromised patients.
2.Patients with Arrhythmias.
3.Patents in which there is inability to take Radial Artery Cannulation.
4.Any Contraindications to Cuff application or inflation.
5.Pregnant Females.
6.Difference of more than 10 mm of hg blood pressure in both the arms
7.Different surgical positions other than supine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method on invasive blood pressure monitoring is not reliable alternative to invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring during intraoperative blood pressure manipulation.Timepoint: Outcome will be assessed after collection of data from all the 40 patients within period of 18 months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method on invasive blood pressure measuring technique tend to underestimate hypotension and overestimate hypertensionTimepoint: Outcome will be assessed after collection of data from all the 40 samples within 18 month period.