MedPath

Effects of Ulnar Styloid and Sigmoid Notch Fractures on Postoperative Wrist Function of Distal Radius Fracture Patients

Conditions
Radius Fracture Distal
Interventions
Procedure: open reduction and internal fixation
Registration Number
NCT03359278
Lead Sponsor
Peking University People's Hospital
Brief Summary

To study the effects of ulnar styloid and sigmoid notch fractures on postoperative wrist function in patients with distal radius fracture

Detailed Description

Patients treated for distal radius fracture in the Department of Orthopedic Trauma at the People's Hospital of Peking University will be selected for outpatient follow-up. Evaluation was based on Sartiento's modification of the Gartland and Werley score. Efficacy was assessed with wrist pain as the focus.The follow-up time is one year after the operation。

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
139
Inclusion Criteria
  1. unilateral distal radius fracture with or without ulnar styloid fracture, closed fracture
  2. distal radius fracture repaired by internal fixation using a palmar plate
  3. age of ≥18 years
  4. integral clinical data, a postoperative follow-up period of ≥12 months
  5. distal radius fracture with normal union
  6. provision of informed consent after receiving an explanation of the purpose of this study
Exclusion Criteria
  1. old fracture, pathological fracture, open fracture
  2. bilateral distal radius fracture
  3. fracture of other parts of the wrist (excluding the ulnar styloid)

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
open reduction and internal fixationopen reduction and internal fixationThe volar approach was used for open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sartiento's modification of the Gartland and Werley score1 year after surgery

Sartiento's modification of the Gartland and Werley score included evaluation of residual deformity, subjective evaluation of pain, objective evaluation of range of wrist motion and grip strength, and evaluation of complications of arthritis, neurological symptoms, and finger dysfunction. Efficacy was judged as excellent, good, fair, or poor, and the sum of the above scores was calculated (excellent, 0-2 points; good, 3-8 points; fair, 9-20 points; and poor, ≥21 points)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ulnar wrist pain(VAS score)1 year after surgery

Evaluation of ulnar wrist pain based on VAS score.Visual Analogue Scale/Score:A cross line of 10 cm on the paper, 0 at one end of the horizontal line, is painless; the other end is 10, indicating a sharp pain; the middle part indicates a different degree of pain.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath