Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07165613
NCT07165613CompletedNot Applicable

Do Different Taping Methods Enhance Performance in Adolescent Volleyball Players With Patient-Reported Ankle Instability?

Yeditepe University1 site in 1 country29 target enrollmentStarted: March 15, 2019Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
29
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Single Leg Hop Test

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of different types of taping application to functional performancein adolescent volleyball players with functional ankle instability. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool was used to select participants, 27 and less than 27 scores were included. Twenty-nine players mean age is 13,49±2,1 were included. Functional performance tests (Single Leg Hop Test, Triple Hop Test, Crossover Hop Test, 6 m. Hop Time Test) were applied to all players according to results control group and taping groups ( kinesiology tape group, dynamic tape group ) were created. Immediately, functional performance test were repeated after kinesiology taping and dynamic taping applied. Statistically no significant difference was found between control groups and both taping groups (p>0,05). When the results of taping and non-taping compared, significant difference was not found (p>0,05). As a result, we may say that taping has no effect to functional performance on players with functional ankle instability. More study is needed about effects of taping to functional performance on athletes with sports injuries.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
10 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Athletes scoring 27 or below active volleyball players without recent severe lower extremity injuries

Exclusion Criteria

  • having surgery within six months, ankle injuries in the preceding month. Those scoring above 27, having recent injuries, surgery, or metabolic disorders

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Single Leg Hop Test

Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-taping): Immediately before taping Post-intervention (Post-taping): Immediately after taping

Single Leg Hop Test

Triple hop test

Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-taping): Immediately before taping Post-intervention (Post-taping): Immediately after taping

Triple hop test

crossover hop test

Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-taping): Immediately before taping Post-intervention (Post-taping): Immediately after taping

crossover hop test

6m timed hop test

Time Frame: Baseline (Pre-taping): Immediately before taping Post-intervention (Post-taping): Immediately after taping

6m timed hop test

Secondary Outcomes

  • t scores(Baseline (Pre-taping): Immediately before taping Post-intervention (Post-taping): Immediately after taping)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Feyza Sule BADILLI HANTAL

Asst.Prof

Yeditepe University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Effects of Taping on Performance in... | Clinical Trial